Category: Behavior Analytics

  • FullSession vs. Hotjar Heatmaps

    FullSession vs. Hotjar Heatmaps: Which Wins for SaaS? Skip to content
    Comparison

    FullSession vs. Hotjar Heatmaps: Pick the Stack That Lifts Conversion Faster

    By Roman Mohren, FullSession CEO • Last updated: Nov 2025

    Related reading: Heatmaps for Conversion: From Insight to A/B Wins

    TL;DR: Teams that pair interactive heatmaps with funnel jump-to-replay identify friction faster and protect conversion on priority flows. Updated: Nov 2025.

    Privacy: Sensitive inputs are masked by default; allow-list only when truly necessary.

    On this page

    Decision TL;DR: Who should pick which?

    Choose FullSession if you want interactive heatmaps with real-time readouts, quick funnel drop-off context, and a privacy-first capture model designed to keep payloads light—ideal for PLG teams who need fast diagnosis and fewer tools to juggle.

    Choose Hotjar if you mainly want a surveys‑first UX stack and prefer its broader template library.

    Note: FullSession also includes in‑app feedback, so teams can keep feedback + heatmaps + funnels in one workflow.

    See Interactive Heatmaps

    Feature / Cost / Privacy Parity (Updated Nov 2025)

    Snapshot based on public pages; confirm current details with vendors.

    Feature parity

    CapabilityFullSessionHotjarUpdated
    Click/tap & scroll heatmapsYes (interactive / near real-time)Yes (aggregate)Nov 2025
    Rage-click / frustration signalsYesYesNov 2025
    Funnels with heatmap/replay jumpYes (drop-off context)Funnels supported; integration variesNov 2025
    Session replays next to hotspotsYesYesNov 2025
    Device/viewport segmentationYesYesNov 2025

    Cost posture (operating guidance)

    LensFullSessionHotjarUpdated
    Pricing visibilityPublic pricing pagePublic pricing; free + paid tiersNov 2025
    Entry positioningTrial / transparent tiersFree plan with session capsNov 2025
    Scaling watch-outsRight-size capture; keep payload leanWatch session caps & add-onsNov 2025

    Privacy posture

    AreaFullSessionHotjarUpdated
    Default input maskingOn (allow-list exceptions)Privacy & consent controls documentedNov 2025
    Replay/heatmap controlsGranular, privacy-firstSuite-level controlsNov 2025

    Migration (3 steps, ~30 minutes typical)

    1) Install the snippet (5–10 min)

    Add FullSession via tag manager or module import. Confirm default masking and consent flags.

    2) Create a like-for-like view (10–15 min)

    Reproduce your top Hotjar views: device filters, target pages, and key steps (pricing, sign-up, checkout). Save presets in FullSession.

    3) Validate parity & switch (5 min)

    Compare click/tap clusters and scroll depth over a 24–72h window. Spot-check with replay; then move the team’s daily ritual to FullSession.

    Start Free Trial

    Risks & mitigations

    • Risk #1: Different heatmap sampling windows create apparent discrepancies. Mitigation: Align windows (e.g., 7 days) and device filters before comparing.
    • Risk #2: SDK overhead on Core Web Vitals. Mitigation: Use streamed, batched capture; keep masking defaults to reduce payload.
    • Risk #3: Team change-management. Mitigation: Save presets (A/B Rescue, Mobile Fold, Rage-Tap) and run a 15-minute workflow enablement.

    Book a data deep dive

    Proof (before/after)

    ScenarioKPIBefore (median)After (median)LiftMethodWindowUpdated
    Heatmap-to-funnel triageCheckout conversion2.3%2.9%+26%Pre/PostLast 90 daysNov 2025
    Mobile fold fix from hotspotsSign-up completion41%46%+5 ptsAA cohortLast 60 daysNov 2025
    Rage-tap disabled CTA fixTime-to-diagnosis10.5h6.8h−35%ITSLast 90 daysNov 2025

    Heatmap → Funnel triage

    Checkout conversion • Before: 2.3% • After: 2.9% • Lift: +26% (dir.) • Method: Pre/Post • Window: 90d • Updated: Nov 2025

    Mobile fold fix

    Sign-up completion • Before: 41% • After: 46% • Lift: +5 pts (dir.) • Method: AA • Window: 60d • Updated: Nov 2025

    Rage-tap CTA fix

    Time-to-diagnosis • Before: 10.5h • After: 6.8h • Lift: −35% (dir.) • Method: ITS • Window: 90d • Updated: Nov 2025

    See Interactive Heatmaps

    Switch & Save

    Get started on the plan that fits your workflow. You can switch plans anytime.

    FAQs

    Does FullSession support the same heatmap types as Hotjar?
    Yes—click/tap and scroll coverage, plus frustration signals. FullSession emphasizes interactive/near real-time readouts and quick funnel context.
    How does pricing compare?
    Both have public pricing pages; Hotjar highlights a free plan with session caps and paid tiers. Confirm current details on each vendor’s site.
    What about privacy?
    FullSession masks sensitive inputs by default with allow-lists for exceptions; Hotjar documents privacy practices across its suite. Evaluate per your data policy.
    Can I migrate saved views?
    Recreate your top filters (pages, devices, variants) as saved presets in FullSession; parity typically takes ~30 minutes.
    Will this slow my site?
    FullSession capture is engineered for low overhead via streaming/batching; keep masking defaults to minimize payload.
    Can I still use surveys/polls?
    If you rely heavily on Hotjar’s surveys, you can keep them and run FullSession for heatmaps/funnel triage—or consolidate as your team prefers.
    Do I need replays?
    Heatmaps show where; replays reveal why. Many teams use both for faster fixes, especially on mobile friction.

  • Mobile vs. Desktop Heatmaps: What Changes and Why It Matters

    Mobile vs. Desktop Heatmaps: What Changes & Why Skip to content
    Responsive UX

    Mobile vs. Desktop Heatmaps: What Changes and Why It Matters

    By Roman Mohren, FullSession CEO • Last updated: Nov 2025

    ← Pillar: Heatmaps for Conversion — From Insight to A/B Wins

    TL;DR: Comparing mobile vs desktop heatmaps at key steps surfaces gesture-driven friction earlier and reduces time-to-fix on responsive UX issues. Updated: Nov 2025.

    Privacy: Sensitive inputs are masked by default; enable allow-lists sparingly for non-sensitive fields only.

    On this page

    Problem signals: how device context hides (or reveals) friction

    Mobile users tap; desktop users click and hover. That difference changes what heatmaps reveal—and which fixes move the needle.

    • Mobile sign-up stalls while desktop holds: often tap-target sizing, keyboard overlap, or validation copy that’s truncated on small screens.
    • Checkout coupon rage taps on mobile only: hitbox misalignment or disabled-state logic that doesn’t visually communicate.
    • Scroll-to-nowhere on long pages: mobile scroll depth heatmaps show where attention dies; desktop hover maps may incorrectly suggest engagement.
    • Variant wins on desktop, loses on mobile: responsive layout shifts move CTAs below the fold, raising scroll burden on smaller viewports.

    See Interactive Heatmaps

    Root-cause map (decision tree)

    1. Start with the funnel step showing the drop (e.g., address form, plan selection).
    2. Is the drop device-specific? Mobile only → inspect tap clusters, fold position, keyboard overlap. Desktop only → check hover→no click zones, tooltip reliance, precision-required UI.
    3. Is engagement high but progression low? Yes → likely validation or hitbox issue; review rage taps and disabled CTAs. No → content/IA problem; review scroll depth and element visibility.
    4. Do you see API 4xx/5xx near the hotspot? Yes → jump to Session Replay to inspect request/response and DOM state. No → stay in heatmap to test layout, copy, and target sizes.

    How to fix it in 3 steps (Interactive Heatmaps deep-dive)

    Step 1 — Segment by device & viewport

    Filter heatmaps to Mobile vs Desktop (optionally by iPhone/Android or breakpoint buckets). Enable overlays for rage taps, dead taps, and fold line. This reveals whether users are trying—and failing—to perform the intended action.

    Step 2 — Isolate the misbehaving element

    Use element-level stats to evaluate tap-through rate, time-to-next-step, and retry attempts. On mobile, prioritize: tap target size & spacing (44px+ recommended), keyboard overlap, disabled vs loading states.

    Step 3 — Validate with a short window

    Ship UI tweaks behind a flag and re-run heatmaps for 24–72 hours. Compare predicted median completion from your baseline to the observed median post-fix, and spot-check with Session Replay to ensure there’s no new friction.

    Evidence

    ScenarioPredicted median completionObserved median completionMethod / WindowUpdated
    Mobile CTA tap-target increasedHigher than baselineDirectionally higher on mobileDirectional pre/post; 30–60 daysNov 2025
    Coupon field validation clarifiedSlightly higherDirectionally higher; fewer retriesDirectional AA; 14–30 daysNov 2025
    Plan selector moved above fold (mobile)HigherDirectionally higher; lower scroll depthDirectional cohort; 30 daysNov 2025

    Tap-target increase

    Pred: Higher • Obs: Directionally higher • Win: 30–60d • Updated: Nov 2025

    Coupon copy

    Pred: Slightly higher • Obs: Directionally higher • Win: 14–30d • Updated: Nov 2025

    Above-fold selector

    Pred: Higher • Obs: Directionally higher • Win: 30d • Updated: Nov 2025

    Case snippet

    A consumer subscription site saw flat desktop conversion but sliding mobile sign-ups. Heatmaps showed dense rage taps on a disabled “Continue” button and shallow scroll depth on screens ≤ 650px. Session Replay confirmed a keyboard covering an address field plus a hidden error message. The team increased tap-target size, raised the CTA above the fold for small viewports, and added a visible loading/validation state. Within 48 hours of rollout to 25% of traffic, the mobile heatmap cooled and retries dropped. A week later, mobile completion stabilized, and desktop remained unaffected. With masking on, no sensitive inputs were captured—only interaction patterns and system states required for diagnosis.

    View a session replay example

    Next steps

    • Enable Interactive Heatmaps and segment by device and viewport.
    • Prioritize rage tap clusters and below-the-fold CTAs on mobile.
    • Validate fixes within 72 hours, confirm via Session Replay, and roll out broadly.

  • Error-State Heatmaps: Spot UI Breaks Before Users Churn

    Error-State Heatmaps: Catch UI Breaks Before Churn Skip to content
    MoFu • Troubleshooting

    Error-State Heatmaps: Find Breaking Points Before Users Bounce

    By Roman Mohren, FullSession CEO • Last updated: Nov 2025

    Pillar: Heatmaps for Conversion — From Insight to A/B Wins

    BLUF: Teams that pair error-state heatmaps with session replay surface breakpoints earlier, shorten time-to-diagnosis, and protect funnel completion on impacted paths. Updated: Nov 2025.

    Privacy: Inputs are masked by default; allow-list only when necessary.

    On this page

    Problem signals (what you’ll notice first)

    • Sudden drop-offs at a specific step (e.g., address or payment field) despite stable traffic mix.
    • Spike in rage clicks/taps clustered around a widget (date picker, coupon field, SSO button).
    • Support tickets with vague repro details (“button does nothing”).
    • A/B variant wins on desktop but loses on mobile—suggesting layout or validation issues.

    See Interactive Heatmaps

    Root-cause map (decision tree)

    1. Start: Is the drop isolated to mobile?
      Yes → Inspect mobile error-state heatmap: tap clusters + element visibility.
      If taps on disabled element → likely state/validation issue.
      If taps off-element → hitbox / layout shift.
    2. If not mobile-only: Cross-check by step & browser.
      If one browser spikes → polyfill or CSS specificity.
      If all browsers → API error or client-side guardrail.
    3. Next: Jump from the hotspot to Session Replay to see console errors, network payloads (422/400) mapped to the DOM state. Masked inputs still reveal interaction patterns (blur/focus, retries).

    View Session Replay

    How to fix it (3 steps) — Deep‑dive: Interactive Heatmaps

    1. Target the impacted step

    Filter heatmap by URL/step, device, and time window. Enable an error-state overlay (or use saved view filters) to surface clusters near sessions with failed requests.

    2. Isolate the misbehaving element

    Use element-level analytics to compare tap/click‑through vs success. Look for rage‑click frequency, hover‑without‑advance, or touchstart→no navigation. Mark suspect elements for replay review.

    3. Validate the fix with a short window

    Ship a fix behind a flag. Re-run the heatmap over 24–72 hours and compare predicted median completion to observed median. Confirm no privacy regressions (masking still on) in replay.

    Evidence (directional mini table)

    ScenarioPredicted median completionObserved median completionMethod / WindowUpdated
    Error‑state overlay enabled on payment stepHigher than baselineDirectionally higher after fix windowDirectional cohort; last 90 daysNov 2025
    Mobile hotspot fix (hitbox)Neutral to higherDirectionally higher on mobileDirectional pre/post; last 30 daysNov 2025
    Validation copy adjustedSlightly higherDirectionally higher; fewer retriesDirectional AA; last 14 daysNov 2025

    Payment step overlay

    Pred: Higher • Obs: Dir. higher • Method: Cohort (90d) • Updated: Nov 2025

    Hitbox fix (mobile)

    Pred: Neutral→Higher • Obs: Dir. higher • Method: Pre/Post (30d) • Updated: Nov 2025

    Validation copy

    Pred: Slightly higher • Obs: Dir. higher; fewer retries • Method: AA (14d) • Updated: Nov 2025

    Start Free Trial

    Case snippet

    A PLG SaaS team saw sign‑up completions sag on mobile while desktop held flat. Error‑state heatmaps showed dense tap clusters on a disabled “Continue” button—replay revealed a client‑side guard that awaited a third‑party validation call that occasionally timed out. With masking on, the team still observed the interaction path and network 422s. They widened the hitbox, added optimistic UI copy, and retried validation in the background. Within two days, the heatmap cooled and replays showed fewer repeated taps and abandonments. The team kept masking defaults and reviewed the Help Center checklist before rolling out broadly.

    Get a Demo

    Next steps

    • Add the snippet and enable Interactive Heatmaps for your target step.
    • Use error‑state overlay (or equivalent view) to prioritize hotspots.
    • Jump to Session Replay for the most‑impacted elements to validate and fix.
    • Re‑run heatmaps over 24–72 hours to confirm directional improvement.

  • Heatmaps for Checkout Optimization (SaaS vs. Ecommerce Walkthroughs)

    Checkout Heatmaps: SaaS vs Ecommerce Walkthroughs Skip to content
    Walkthroughs

    Heatmaps for Checkout Optimization: SaaS vs Ecommerce Walkthroughs

    By Roman Mohren, CEO @ FullSession • Last updated: Nov 2025

    Part of our pillar: Heatmaps for Conversion: From Insight to A/B Wins

    TL;DR: Teams that pair interactive heatmaps with funnel drop-off context identify checkout friction faster and protect completion rates on the most valuable paths. Updated: Nov 2025.

    Privacy: Inputs are masked by default; allow-list only when necessary.

    On this page

    Decision TL;DR: Who should pick which workflow?

    SaaS checkout (subscriptions): Choose heatmaps + Funnels with device segmentation to isolate plan card interactions, below-the-fold CTAs, and disabled “Continue” states. Prioritize steps where payment + tax + address forms stack vertically on mobile.

    Ecommerce checkout (carts): Choose heatmaps + Funnels focused on coupon/gift card fields, shipping method toggles, and guest vs sign-in friction. Prioritize tap clusters near Apply buttons and address auto-complete behavior.

    Hybrid orgs: Standardize on Interactive Heatmaps for both flows so teams triage where (heatmap) → drop-off (funnel) → why (optional replay) in one motion.

    See Interactive Heatmaps

    Feature / Cost / Privacy Parity (Updated Nov 2025)

    Snapshot of how SaaS vs Ecommerce checkout optimization typically uses FullSession. Use it to choose your starting configuration.

    Feature parity (SaaS vs Ecommerce)

    CapabilitySaaS CheckoutEcommerce CheckoutUpdated
    Device/viewport segmentationRequired for plan grid + billing stacksRequired for cart + shipping stepsNov 2025
    Rage-tap / dead-tap overlaysDisabled “Continue”, SSO, plan togglesCoupon “Apply”, gift card, shipping togglesNov 2025
    Scroll/fold analysisCTA falls below fold on mobileOrder summary pushes CTA below foldNov 2025
    Funnel jump-to-heatmapPlan → Billing → ConfirmCart → Shipping → Payment → ConfirmNov 2025
    (Optional) jump-to-replayValidate validation states & timingValidate auto-complete & API latenciesNov 2025

    Cost posture (operating guidance)

    LensSaaS CheckoutEcommerce CheckoutUpdated
    Data capture scopeTarget pricing/plan + payment stepsTarget cart + checkout stepsNov 2025
    Scaling watch-outsLong forms inflate retries; keep maskingHigh traffic → sample windows sensiblyNov 2025
    Optimization cadenceWeekly micro-tweaks behind flagsDaily micro-tweaks tied to promo cadenceNov 2025

    Privacy posture

    AreaSaaS CheckoutEcommerce CheckoutUpdated
    Input masking defaultsKeep masked; allow-list only non-sensitive display fieldsSame; confirm coupon codes are maskedNov 2025
    Consent & complianceHonor consent signals; minimize payloadSame; confirm third-party widgets’ behaviorNov 2025

    Pricing

    Migration (3 steps, ~30 minutes typical)

    Install & segment (5–10 minutes)

    Add the FullSession snippet via tag manager or module import. Enable device/viewport filters and confirm masking & consent.

    Create saved views (10–15 minutes)

    • SaaS: “Plan Grid (Mobile)”, “Billing Form Error States”, “Confirm Step”.
    • Ecommerce: “Coupon Apply + Order Summary”, “Shipping Method Toggle”, “Payment Step”.

    Add funnel jump-to-heatmap shortcuts for each.

    Validate parity & go live (5 minutes)

    Run a 24–72h window, compare tap clusters, scroll depth, and drop-off deltas. (Optional) spot-check with replay. Standardize the daily triage ritual.

    Start Free Trial

    Risks & mitigations

    • Risk: “Heatmap discrepancy” from mismatched windows. Mitigation: Align date ranges, devices, and steps before comparing.
    • Risk: False positives from promo traffic. Mitigation: Annotate campaigns; compare like-for-like windows and traffic sources in Funnels.
    • Risk: Over-collection / payload bloat. Mitigation: Keep masking defaults; restrict capture to checkout steps.
    • Risk: Team context switching between tools. Mitigation: Use funnel jump-to-heatmap (and optional replay) to keep diagnosis in one place.

    Get a Demo

    Proof (before/after)

    ScenarioKPIBefore (median)After (median)LiftMethodWindowUpdated
    Ecommerce: Coupon “Apply” friction fixCheckout conversion2.8%3.4%+21% (dir.)Pre/PostLast 60 daysNov 2025
    SaaS: Move Confirm CTA above fold (mobile)Plan purchase completion43%48%+5 pts (dir.)AA cohortLast 30 daysNov 2025
    Mixed: Disabled-CTA rage-tap fixTime-to-diagnosis9.6h6.2h−35% (dir.)ITSLast 90 daysNov 2025

    Coupon “Apply” UX fix

    Checkout conversion • Before: 2.8% • After: 3.4% • Lift: +21% (dir.) • Method: Pre/Post • Window: 60d • Updated: Nov 2025

    Confirm CTA above fold

    Plan purchase • Before: 43% • After: 48% • Lift: +5 pts (dir.) • Method: AA • Window: 30d • Updated: Nov 2025

    Disabled-CTA handling

    Time-to-diagnosis • Before: 9.6h • After: 6.2h • Lift: −35% (dir.) • Method: ITS • Window: 90d • Updated: Nov 2025

    See Funnels

    Switch & Save

    Get started on the plan that fits your workflow. You can switch plans anytime.

    FAQs

    What’s the difference between SaaS and ecommerce checkout heatmaps?
    SaaS emphasizes plan selection + form validation, while ecommerce emphasizes cart/coupon and shipping/payment toggles. Heatmaps reveal where attention stalls; Funnels quantify impact.
    Do I need session replay to optimize checkout?
    Heatmaps + Funnels identify where and how much. Replay is optional but useful to verify why (e.g., disabled states, API errors).
    How do we avoid exposing sensitive data?
    FullSession masks inputs by default. Only allow-list non-sensitive fields required for UX diagnosis and document the decision.
    Will adding heatmaps slow checkout?
    FullSession capture is streamed/batched to minimize overhead and avoid blocking render.
    Can I compare pre- and post-fix quickly?
    Yes—re-run heatmaps for 24–72h, then compare predicted median vs observed median completion in Funnels.
    What should we test first?
    Start with mobile fold position, coupon “Apply” UX, tap-target sizes, and disabled-state feedback. These drive frequent, high-leverage wins.
    How do we scale this across brands/locales?
    Create saved views for common steps and replicate filters by brand/locale; review daily during promo periods.

  • Heatmaps + A/B Testing: Prioritize Hypotheses that Win

    Heatmaps + A/B Testing: Prioritize Winners Faster :root{–fs-max:920px;–fs-space-1:8px;–fs-space-2:12px;–fs-space-3:16px;–fs-space-4:24px;–fs-space-5:40px;–fs-radius:12px;–fs-border:#e6e6e6;–fs-text:#111;–fs-muted:#666;–fs-bg:#ffffff;–fs-accent:#111;–fs-accent-contrast:#fff} @media (prefers-color-scheme: dark){:root{–fs-bg:#0b0b0b;–fs-text:#f4f4f4;–fs-muted:#aaa;–fs-border:#222;–fs-accent:#fafafa;–fs-accent-contrast:#111}} html{scroll-behavior:smooth} body{margin:0;background:var(–fs-bg);color:var(–fs-text);font:16px/1.7 system-ui,-apple-system,Segoe UI,Roboto,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif} .container{max-width:var(–fs-max);margin:0 auto;padding:var(–fs-space-4)} .eyebrow{font-size:.85rem;letter-spacing:.08em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(–fs-muted)} .hero{display:flex;flex-direction:column;gap:var(–fs-space-2);margin:var(–fs-space-4) 0} .bluf{background:linear-gradient(180deg,rgba(0,0,0,.04),rgba(0,0,0,.02));padding:var(–fs-space-4);border-radius:var(–fs-radius);border:1px solid var(–fs-border)} .cta-row{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:var(–fs-space-2);margin:var(–fs-space-2) 0} .btn{display:inline-block;padding:12px 18px;border-radius:999px;text-decoration:none;border:1px solid var(–fs-border);transition:transform .04s ease,background .2s ease,border-color .2s ease,box-shadow .2s ease} .btn:hover{transform:translateY(-1px)} .btn:active{transform:translateY(0)} .btn:focus-visible{outline:2px solid currentColor;outline-offset:2px} .btn-primary{background:var(–fs-accent);color:var(–fs-accent-contrast);border-color:var(–fs-accent)} .btn-primary:hover{box-shadow:0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,.15)} .btn-ghost{background:transparent;color:var(–fs-text)} .btn-ghost:hover{background:rgba(0,0,0,.05)} .sticky-wrap{position:fixed;right:20px;bottom:20px;z-index:50} .sticky-cta{background:var(–fs-accent);color:var(–fs-accent-contrast);border:none;border-radius:999px;padding:10px 18px;display:inline-flex;align-items:center;gap:8px;box-shadow:0 10px 24px rgba(0,0,0,.2)} @media (max-width:640px){.sticky-wrap{left:16px;right:16px}.sticky-cta{justify-content:center;width:100%}} .section{margin:var(–fs-space-5) 0; scroll-margin-top:80px} .section h2{margin:0 0 var(–fs-space-2)} .kicker{color:var(–fs-muted)} .grid{display:grid;gap:var(–fs-space-3)} .grid-2{grid-template-columns:1fr} @media(min-width:800px){.grid-2{grid-template-columns:1fr 1fr}} .table{width:100%;border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0;margin:var(–fs-space-3) 0;border:1px solid var(–fs-border);border-radius:10px;overflow:hidden} .table th,.table td{padding:12px 14px;border-top:1px solid var(–fs-border);text-align:left;vertical-align:top} .table thead th{background:rgba(0,0,0,.04);border-top:none} .table tbody tr:nth-child(odd){background:rgba(0,0,0,.02)} .caption{font-size:.9rem;color:var(–fs-muted);margin-top:8px} .faq dt{font-weight:650;margin-top:var(–fs-space-2)} .faq dd{margin:6px 0 var(–fs-space-2) 0} .sr-only{position:absolute;width:1px;height:1px;overflow:hidden;clip:rect(0 0 0 0);white-space:nowrap} .pill-nav{display:flex;gap:10px;flex-wrap:wrap} .pill-nav a{padding:10px 14px;border-radius:999px;border:1px solid var(–fs-border);text-decoration:none} /* TOC */ .toc{background:linear-gradient(180deg,rgba(0,0,0,.02),rgba(0,0,0,.01));border:1px solid var(–fs-border);border-radius:var(–fs-radius);padding:var(–fs-space-4)} .toc h2{margin-top:0} .toc ul{columns:1;gap:var(–fs-space-3);margin:0;padding-left:18px} @media(min-width:900px){.toc ul{columns:2}} /* Cards on mobile for tables */ .cards{display:none} .card{border:1px solid var(–fs-border);border-radius:10px;padding:12px} .card h4{margin:0 0 6px} .card .meta{font-size:.9rem;color:var(–fs-muted)} @media(max-width:720px){.table{display:none}.cards{display:grid;gap:12px}} /* Optional tiny style enhancement */ a:not(.btn){text-decoration-thickness:.06em;text-underline-offset:.2em} a:not(.btn):hover{text-decoration-thickness:.1em} .related{border-top:1px solid var(–fs-border);margin-top:var(–fs-space-5);padding-top:var(–fs-space-4)} .related ul{display:flex;gap:12px;flex-wrap:wrap;padding-left:18px} { “@context”:”https://schema.org”, “@type”:”Article”, “headline”:”Heatmaps + A/B Testing: How to Prioritize the Hypotheses That Win”, “description”:”Use device-segmented heatmaps alongside A/B tests to identify friction, rescue variants, and focus on changes that lift conversion.”, “mainEntityOfPage”:{“@type”:”WebPage”,”@id”:”https://www.fullsession.io/blog/heatmaps-ab-testing-prioritization”}, “datePublished”:”2025-11-17″, “dateModified”:”2025-11-17″, “author”:{“@type”:”Person”,”name”:”Roman Mohren, FullSession CEO”,”jobTitle”:”Chief Executive Officer”}, “about”:[“FullSession Interactive Heatmaps”,”FullSession Funnels”], “publisher”:{“@type”:”Organization”,”name”:”FullSession”} } { “@context”:”https://schema.org”, “@type”:”FAQPage”, “mainEntity”:[ {“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”How do heatmaps improve A/B testing decisions?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”They reveal why a result is neutral or mixed by showing attention, rage taps, and below-fold CTAs—so you can rescue variants with targeted UX fixes.”}}, {“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Can I compare heatmaps across experiment arms?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Yes. Filter by variant param, device, and date range to see A vs B patterns side-by-side.”}}, {“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Does this work for SaaS onboarding and pricing pages?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Absolutely. Pair heatmaps with Funnels to see where intent stalls and to measure completion after UX tweaks.”}}, {“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”What about privacy?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”FullSession masks sensitive inputs by default. You can allow-list fields when strictly necessary; document the rationale.”}}, {“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Will this slow my site?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”FullSession capture is streamed and batched to minimize overhead and avoid blocking render.”}}, {“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”How do I connect variants if I’m using a testing tool?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Pass the experiment ID or variant label as a query param or data layer variable; FullSession lets you filter by it.”}}, {“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”How is FullSession different from other tools?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”FullSession combines interactive heatmaps with Funnels and (optional) session replay so you can move from where to why to fix in one workflow.”}} ] } Skip to content
    A/B Prioritization

    Heatmaps + A/B Testing: How to Prioritize the Hypotheses That Win

    By Roman Mohren, FullSession CEO • Last updated: Nov 2025

    ← Pillar: Heatmaps for Conversion — From Insight to A/B Wins

    TL;DR: Teams that pair device‑segmented heatmaps with A/B test results identify false negatives, rescue high‑potential variants, and focus engineering effort on the highest‑impact UI changes. Updated: Nov 2025.

    Privacy: Input masking is on by default; evaluate changes with masking retained.

    On this page

    Problem signals (why A/B alone wastes cycles)

    • Neutral experiment, hot interaction clusters. Variant B doesn’t “win,” yet heatmaps reveal dense click/tap activity on secondary actions (e.g., “Apply coupon”) that siphon intent.
    • Mobile loses, desktop wins. Aggregated statistics hide device asymmetry; mobile heatmaps show below‑fold CTAs or tap‑target misses that desktop doesn’t suffer.
    • High scroll, low conversion. Heatmaps show attention depth but also dead zones where users stall before key fields.
    • Rage taps on disabled states. Your variant added validation or tooltips, but users hammer a disabled CTA; the metric reads neutral while heatmaps show clear UX friction.

    See Interactive Heatmaps

    Root‑cause map (decision tree)

    1. Start: Your A/B test reads neutral or conflicting across segments. Segment by device & viewport.
    2. If mobile underperforms → Inspect fold line, tap clusters, keyboard overlap.
    3. If desktop underperforms → Check hover→no click and layout density.
    4. Map hotspots to funnel step. If hotspot sits before the drop → it’s a distraction/blocker. If after the drop → investigate latency/validation copy.
    5. Decide action. Variant rescue: keep the candidate and fix the hotspot. Variant retire: no actionable hotspot → reprioritize hypotheses.

    View Session Replay

    How to fix (3 steps) — Deep‑dive: Interactive Heatmaps

    Step 1 — Overlay heatmaps on experiment arms

    Compare Variant A vs B by device and breakpoint. Toggle rage taps, dead taps, and scroll depth. Attach funnel context so you see drop‑off adjacent to each hotspot. Analyze drop‑offs with Funnels.

    Step 2 — Prioritize with “Impact‑to‑Effort” tags

    For each hotspot, tag Impact (H/M/L) and Effort (H/M/L). Focus H‑impact / L‑M effort items first (e.g., demote a secondary CTA, move plan selector above fold, enlarge tap target).

    Step 3 — Validate within 72 hours

    Ship micro‑tweaks behind a flag. Re‑run heatmaps and compare predicted median completion to observed median (24–72h). If the heatmap cools and the funnel improves, graduate the change and archive the extra A/B path.

    Evidence (mini table)

    ScenarioPredicted median completionObserved median completionMethod / WindowUpdated
    Demote secondary CTA on pricingHigher than baselineHigherPre/post; 14–30 daysNov 2025
    Move plan selector above fold (mobile)HigherHigher; lower scroll burdenCohort; 30 daysNov 2025
    Copy tweak for validation hintSlightly higherHigher; fewer retriesAA; 14 daysNov 2025

    Demote secondary CTA

    Predicted: Higher • Observed: Higher • Window: 14–30d • Updated: Nov 2025

    Above‑fold selector (mobile)

    Predicted: Higher • Observed: Higher • Window: 30d • Updated: Nov 2025

    Validation hint copy

    Predicted: Slightly higher • Observed: Higher • Window: 14d • Updated: Nov 2025

    Case snippet

    A PLG team ran a pricing page test: Variant B streamlined plan cards, yet overall results looked neutral. Heatmaps told a different story—mobile users were fixating on a coupon field and repeatedly tapping a disabled “Apply” button. Funnels showed a disproportionate drop right after coupon entry. The team demoted the coupon field, raised the primary CTA above the fold, and added a loading indicator on “Apply.” Within 72 hours, the mobile heatmap cooled around the coupon area, rage taps fell, and the observed median completion climbed in the confirm step. They shipped the changes, rescued Variant B, and archived the test as “resolved with UX fix,” rather than burning another sprint on low‑probability hypotheses.

    View a session replay example

    Next steps

    • Add the snippet, enable Interactive Heatmaps, and connect your experiment IDs or variant query params.
    • For every “neutral” test, run a mobile‑first heatmap review and check Funnels for adjacent drop‑offs.
    • Ship micro‑tweaks behind flags, validate in 24–72 hours, and standardize an Impact‑to‑Effort rubric in your optimization playbook.

    FAQs

    How do heatmaps improve A/B testing decisions?
    They reveal why a result is neutral or mixed—by showing attention, rage taps, and below‑fold CTAs—so you can rescue variants with targeted UX fixes.
    Can I compare heatmaps across experiment arms?
    Yes. Filter by variant param, device, and date range to see A vs B patterns side‑by‑side.
    Does this work for SaaS onboarding and pricing pages?
    Absolutely. Pair heatmaps with Funnels to see where intent stalls and to measure completion after UX tweaks.
    What about privacy?
    FullSession masks sensitive inputs by default. Allow‑list only when necessary and document the rationale.
    Will this slow my site?
    FullSession capture is streamed and batched to minimize overhead and avoid blocking render.
    How do I connect variants if I’m using a testing tool?
    Pass the experiment ID / variant label as a query param or data layer variable; then filter by it in FullSession.
    We’re evaluating heatmap tools—how is FullSession different?
    FullSession combines interactive heatmaps with Funnels and optional session replay, so you can go from where → why → fix in one workflow.
    document.addEventListener(‘click’, function(e){ var t = e.target; if(t.matches(‘.bluf a, .hero a’)){ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; window.dataLayer.push({event:’bluf_click’, label:t.href}); } if(t.matches(‘.sticky-cta’)){ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; window.dataLayer.push({event:’trial_start’, label:’sticky’}); } if(t.matches(‘#next-steps .pill-nav a’)){ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; window.dataLayer.push({event:’switch_offer_view’, label:t.textContent.trim()}); } if(t.matches(‘#faqs dt’)){ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; window.dataLayer.push({event:’faq_expand’, label:t.textContent.trim()}); } });

  • Real-Time Heatmaps for Product Launches: First 48 Hours Checklist

    Real-Time Heatmaps: First 48 Hours Launch Checklist Skip to content
    Checklist

    Real-Time Heatmaps for Product Launches: Your First 48 Hours Checklist

    By Roman Mohren, FullSession CEO • Last updated: Nov 2025

    Pillar: Heatmaps for Conversion: From Insight to A/B Wins

    TL;DR: Teams that monitor real-time heatmaps during the first 48 hours of a launch surface friction sooner, shorten time-to-diagnosis, and protect conversion on high-intent paths. Updated: Nov 2025.

    Privacy: Sensitive inputs are masked by default; enable allow-lists sparingly for non-sensitive fields only.

    On this page

    Problem signals: launch-week failure modes you can catch fast

    Even great launches stumble in the first 48 hours because real users behave differently than test cohorts.

    • Tap/click clusters on non-primary elements siphon intent from the signup/checkout path.
    • Rage taps on disabled CTAs when validation or feature flags delay state changes.
    • Below-the-fold placement of key CTAs on mobile due to last-minute layout shifts.
    • High attention, low progression: heatmaps show activity, while Funnels reveal the stall step.
    • Promo code rabbit holes (ecom) and SSO hiccups (SaaS onboarding).

    See Interactive Heatmaps

    Root-cause map: a 48-hour decision tree

    Hour 0–6 (launch live)

    Is traffic spiking but conversions lag?

    • Yes (mobile more affected): Check fold line and tap clusters; move CTA above fold; enlarge hitboxes.
    • Yes (all devices): Check secondary-link hotspots pulling users away; demote or gate.
    • No: Proceed to stability checks.

    Any rage taps or “dead taps” near CTAs?

    • Yes: Jump to Session Replay to inspect validation/error states and network timing.
    • No: Continue monitoring; set alerts for rage metrics.

    Hour 6–24 (steady state emerges)

    Are hotspots near forms or payment?

    • SaaS: Plan grid, SSO, billing validation.
    • Ecommerce: Coupon Apply, shipping method toggle, address auto-complete.

    Prioritize hotspots that coincide with funnel drop-offs.

    Hour 24–48 (iterate)

    • Ship micro-fixes behind flags (move CTA above fold on mobile; clarify validation copy; debounce coupon; add visible loading).
    • Re-run heatmaps for 24 hours and compare predicted median vs observed median completion.

    View Session Replay

    How to run the checklist in 3 steps (deep-dive: Interactive Heatmaps)

    Step 1 — Create real-time launch views (15 min)

    Set Saved Views for: “Launch Lander (Mobile)”, “Onboarding Modal”, “Checkout/Paywall”, and “Post-Install Step.” Enable overlays: rage taps, dead taps, fold line, device/viewport filters. For ecommerce, add Coupon Apply and Order Summary views; for SaaS, add Plan Grid and Billing.

    Step 2 — Tie heatmaps to outcome context (10 min)

    Open Funnels in a split workflow: for each hotspot, jump to the adjacent drop-off step to quantify impact. Tag hotspots with Impact (H/M/L) and Effort (H/M/L); queue H/L changes first (copy, layout, hitbox, loading state).

    Step 3 — Validate fixes within 24–48 hours (15–30 min)

    Ship micro-fixes behind flags. Re-run heatmaps and compare predicted median completion to observed median—spot-check a handful of sessions with replay.

    Case snippet

    A PLG team launched a new “Pro” plan on a Friday. In the first two hours, real-time heatmaps showed dense mobile tap clusters below the fold on the pricing page. Funnels confirmed a sharp Plan → Billing drop on small viewports. Session Replay revealed a disabled “Continue” state that waited for plan confirmation from a feature flag service. The team moved the CTA above the fold for ≤700px screens, added a visible loading state, and pre-confirmed the plan client-side with a server check after. Within 24 hours, the mobile heatmap cooled, rage taps dropped, and observed median plan completion rose directionally. No sensitive inputs were captured—masking remained on by default. By Monday, they rolled out the fix to 100% of traffic and kept the real-time view pinned for the week.

    Get a Demo

    Next steps

    • Pin real-time Saved Views for your launch-critical pages and steps.
    • Review mobile-first heatmaps hourly for the first 6–12 hours.
    • Use Funnels to quantify impact; ship H/L fixes behind flags.
    • Recheck heatmaps after 24–48 hours; if stable, archive views and document learnings.

    First 48 Hours: Real-Time Heatmap Starters (Updated Nov 2025)

    StepWhat to watchHeatmap signalFunnel step to monitorTypical fixUpdated
    Launch lander (mobile)CTA visibilityFold line; tap off-targetLander → Sign upMove CTA above fold; enlarge targetsNov 2025
    Pricing/Plan grid (SaaS)Plan selection clarityTaps on non-primary areasPlan → BillingClarify hierarchy; highlight primaryNov 2025
    Coupon/Apply (ecom)Validation feedbackRage taps; retriesCart → ShippingDebounce; inline feedbackNov 2025
    Billing formsDisabled CTADead/rage tapsBilling → ConfirmLoading state; input hintsNov 2025
    Onboarding modalContent comprehensionHigh attention; no advanceModal → Next stepShorten copy; clearer CTANov 2025

    Launch lander (mobile)

    Watch: CTA visibility • Signals: Fold line, off-target taps • Monitor: Lander → Sign up • Fix: Move CTA above fold; enlarge targets • Updated: Nov 2025

    Pricing/Plan grid (SaaS)

    Watch: Selection clarity • Signals: Non-primary taps • Monitor: Plan → Billing • Fix: Clarify hierarchy; highlight primary • Updated: Nov 2025

    Coupon/Apply (ecom)

    Watch: Validation feedback • Signals: Rage taps; retries • Monitor: Cart → Shipping • Fix: Debounce; inline feedback • Updated: Nov 2025

    Billing forms

    Watch: Disabled CTA • Signals: Dead/rage taps • Monitor: Billing → Confirm • Fix: Loading state; input hints • Updated: Nov 2025

    Onboarding modal

    Watch: Comprehension • Signals: High attention; no advance • Monitor: Modal → Next step • Fix: Shorten copy; clearer CTA • Updated: Nov 2025

    FAQs

    What makes heatmaps “real-time” and why does it matter at launch?
    Near real-time rendering surfaces where users are struggling while traffic is hottest, so you can push micro-fixes before word-of-mouth or paid spend is wasted.
    Can I segment by device and viewport quickly?
    Yes—filter by device and breakpoint to locate below-the-fold CTAs and tap-target issues on mobile.
    How do I connect heatmaps to outcomes?
    Use Funnels to measure drop-offs adjacent to each hotspot; compare predicted vs observed median completion after fixes.
    Do I need session replay for the launch window?
    Replay is optional but powerful for validating why (validation states, API timing). Start with heatmaps, escalate to replay.
    How do I avoid exposing PII during a hectic launch?
    Keep masking on by default; allow-list only non-sensitive fields if absolutely necessary and document it.
    Will adding capture slow pages under surge traffic?
    FullSession capture is streamed/batched to minimize overhead and avoid blocking render.
    What should be in my “first 48 hours” runbook?
    Saved Views for launch lander, onboarding, and checkout; mobile-first checks; rage/dead-tap overlays; funnel linkage; flag-based micro-fixes; 24–48h validation.

  • Heatmaps for Conversion: From Insight to A/B Wins

    Heatmaps for Conversion: From Insight to A/B Wins Skip to content
    Guide

    Heatmaps for Conversion: From Insight to A/B Test Wins

    By Roman Mohren • Last updated: Nov 2025

    BLUF: Teams that pair interactive heatmaps with funnel context and quick validation tests ship fixes faster and see directional gains in form completion and checkout conversion.

    Updated: Nov 2025.

    Privacy: Inputs are masked by default; enable allow-lists sparingly for non-sensitive fields only.

    On this page

    Problem signals: where conversion leaks start

    Heatmaps show where attention concentrates—and where it goes to die. The most common conversion leaks your team will see:

    • High attention, low advance: Tap/click clusters form around secondary actions (e.g., coupon, learn more), starving the primary path.
    • Mobile below-fold CTAs: Scroll-depth and fold lines reveal that the primary CTA sits just out of view on common viewports.
    • Rage/“dead” taps: Users hammer a disabled button or interact with an element that looks actionable but isn’t.
    • Hover-heavy experiences: Desktop designs rely on hover hints that don’t translate to mobile, creating comprehension gaps.
    • Variant “no-result” mirages: An A/B test looks neutral, while heatmaps expose intent siphons and validation hiccups.

    See Interactive Heatmaps

    Root-cause map: from signal → cause → action

    1. Signal: Rage taps / dead taps near a primary CTA
      Likely causes: Disabled state awaiting validation; hitbox too small; off-screen focus/scroll.
      Action: Enlarge target; add visible loading/validation states; ensure scroll-into-view on submit.
    2. Signal: Tap/click clusters on secondary link (coupon, learn more)
      Likely causes: Misprioritized hierarchy; distracting offer placement.
      Action: Demote secondary element; add inline guardrails (e.g., collapsible coupon); elevate primary CTA.
    3. Signal: Below-fold CTA on mobile
      Likely causes: Responsive layout pushes primary action under order summary or long copy.
      Action: Move CTA above fold for small breakpoints; reduce vertical padding/margins.
    4. Signal: High attention without comprehension (desktop-biased UI)
      Likely causes: Hover-dependence; tooltips as the only instruction.
      Action: Replace hover tips with inline helper text on mobile; increase contrast and affordances.
    5. Signal: Neutral/mixed A/B result
      Likely causes: Unbalanced device outcomes; friction localized to one step.
      Action: Segment heatmaps by device and step; rescue the winner by fixing the hotspot, then re-measure.

    See it on your stack (Demo)

    How to fix it in 3 steps (deep-dive: Interactive Heatmaps)

    Step 1 — Create conversion views (15 min)

    Set Saved Views for: Pricing/Plan, Sign-up/Billing, Cart/Shipping/Payment, and Confirm/Thank-you. Enable overlays: rage taps, dead taps, fold line, device/viewport filters, and element stats (tap-through, retries).

    Step 2 — Tie “where” to “how much” with Funnels (10 min)

    For any hotspot, open Funnels to the adjacent step and quantify drop-off deltas. Tag each issue with Impact (H/M/L) and Effort (H/M/L); schedule H/L items first (copy/layout/hitbox) before component refactors.

    Step 3 — Validate in 24–72 hours (15–30 min)

    Ship micro-tweaks behind flags. Compare predicted p50 completion to observed p50; spot-check a handful of sessions (optional replay) to ensure the heatmap has cooled and the funnel tightened.

    Case snippet

    A subscription SaaS team saw flat desktop conversion but a slide on mobile. Heatmaps showed dense tap clusters on a collapsed coupon section and a below-fold purchase CTA. Funnels confirmed a disproportionate drop between Plan → Billing. The team demoted the coupon, moved the primary CTA above the fold for ≤700px viewports, and added a visible loading/validation state on submit. Within 48 hours, the mobile heatmap cooled, retries fell, and the observed p50 completion ticked upward directionally. Because input masking stayed on, no sensitive data was captured—only the interaction patterns and DOM states needed to confirm the fix. The same playbook later rescued a neutral A/B test on pricing by removing a “learn more” siphon that was attracting clicks without advancing the flow.

    Get a Demo

    Next steps

    • Pin Saved Views for your top conversion steps (pricing/sign-up/cart/checkout).
    • Review mobile-first heatmaps; elevate primary actions above the fold.
    • Use Funnels to quantify impact; ship H/L fixes within 72 hours.
    • Validate, document, and template—convert findings into your A/B test backlog.

    Conversion Triage via Heatmaps (Updated Nov 2025)

    SignalLikely causeHeatmap checkFunnel step to watchRecommended fixUpdated
    Rage taps on primary CTADisabled/validationRage & dead taps; retriesStep before submitVisible loading; scroll-into-viewNov 2025
    Secondary siphon (coupon/learn more)Misprioritized hierarchyHotspots off primary pathStep after hotspotDemote/accordion; elevate primaryNov 2025
    CTA below mobile foldLayout & spacingFold line; shallow depthCurrent step conversionMove CTA above fold; tighten layoutNov 2025
    Hover-only guidanceMobile comprehension gapLow advance post-attentionSame stepInline helper text on mobileNov 2025

    Rage taps on primary CTA

    Cause: Disabled/validation • Checks: Rage & dead taps, retries • Watch: Step before submit • Fix: Visible loading; scroll-into-view • Updated: Nov 2025

    Secondary siphon

    Cause: Misprioritized hierarchy • Checks: Hotspots off primary path • Watch: Step after hotspot • Fix: Demote or accordion; elevate primary • Updated: Nov 2025

    CTA below mobile fold

    Cause: Layout & spacing • Checks: Fold line, shallow depth • Watch: Current step conversion • Fix: Move above fold; tighten layout • Updated: Nov 2025

    Hover-only guidance

    Cause: Mobile comprehension gap • Checks: Low advance post-attention • Watch: Same step • Fix: Inline helper text on mobile • Updated: Nov 2025

    FAQs

    How are heatmaps different from traditional analytics for conversion work?
    Heatmaps reveal where attention concentrates; when paired with Funnels, you see how much it costs in drop-offs—so you can prioritize fixes by impact.
    Do I need session replay to use heatmaps effectively?
    Replay is optional; it helps confirm why (validation timing, API errors). Start with heatmaps + funnels; escalate to replay when a fix needs visual evidence.
    Will heatmaps slow my site or app?
    FullSession capture is streamed/batched and designed to minimize overhead. Keep masking defaults to reduce payload.
    What are high-leverage fixes we can test first?
    Move CTAs above fold (mobile), demote distracting secondaries, enlarge tap targets, and add visible loading/validation states.
    How do we integrate heatmaps with A/B testing?
    Use heatmaps to triage neutral tests: find hotspots, fix friction, then re-measure. Promote winners after the heatmap cools and the funnel improves.
    How should we handle privacy?
    Inputs are masked by default. Only allow-list non-sensitive fields when strictly necessary and document the rationale.
    Does this work for SPAs and modern frameworks?
    Yes. Ensure route changes and virtual-DOM mutations are tracked; then segment by device and viewport in your views.

  • Top 10 VWO Competitors and Alternatives This Year 

    Top 10 VWO Competitors and Alternatives This Year 

    Are you looking to optimize your website’s performance but unsure if VWO is the right choice? You’re in luck! 

    We’ve compiled a list of this year’s top 10 VWO competitors that can help you improve your site’s user experience and conversion rates.

    We’ll break down their use cases, key features and pricing and explain how each alternative compares to VWO. 

    Whether you’re a startup or an enterprise, by the end of this article, you’ll have enough information to select the best platform for your business.

    10 Best VWO Alternatives Right Now

    If you’re looking for VWO alternatives, here are the best solutions to consider:

    1. FullSession: User behavior analytics software that offers session recordings and replays, dynamic heatmaps, website feedback forms, conversion funnel analysis and error tracking. Pricing starts at $39/month with a 20% discount on annual plans. Book a demo to learn more.
    2. PostHog: A self-hosted product analytics platform with customer data tracking, analysis, and extensive integrations. Pricing starts from $0.0000500/event.
    3. Optimizely: A digital experience analytics platform focusing on A/B testing, experimentation, and personalization with advanced targeting capabilities. It provides feature-based pricing not available publicly.
    4. Heap: A digital insights platform automatically capturing web and mobile app data, offering behavioral data visualization and funnel analysis. It has a tiered pricing structure that is available upon request.
    5. AB Tasty: A digital experience optimization platform for marketing teams, providing easy A/B testing and personalization features. Pricing is available upon request.
    6. Amplitude: Product intelligence and event tracking software, offering customer engagement and retention insights. Its scalable pricing starts from $61/month.
    7. LaunchDarkly: A feature management platform with real-time flagging and experimentation features. Its feature-based pricing starts at $12/month.
    8. Crazy Egg: A web analytics tool specializing in website optimization through visual reports like heatmaps. It offers simple pricing with multiple plans starting at $99/month.
    9. FullStory: A digital experience analytics platform providing in-depth insights into user interactions on websites and mobile applications with automatic data capture. Its custom pricing is available upon request.
    10. Adobe Target: Enterprise-level A/B testing and optimization platform with automated personalization and multivariate testing features. Pricing suits large companies and is available upon request.

    When choosing the best solution, consider the specific features and pricing that best align with your requirements.

    Let’s start with our review.

    1. FullSession

    FullSession VWO competitors

    Capture all user interactions, observe how users engage with your website, and improve its interface, usability, experience, and performance with FullSession, an advanced user behavior analytics platform.

    Our intuitive dashboards make visualizing and analyzing all user behavior data easy, helping you spot trends and patterns effortlessly.

    Dive deeper with real-time session replays to see how visitors navigate your site. Our platform gives you a complete view of the customer journey, capturing every action for accurate insights.

    Pinpoint problem areas, test design updates, and improve usability with UX heatmap tools that show you where your site can perform better. Identify inactive zones, optimize page elements, and strengthen your interface based on real user monitoring.

    Use conversion funnel analysis to streamline your path to conversions. Remove barriers, improve key steps in the user journey, and reduce drop-offs to increase your success rates.

    Employ customer feedback collection tools to discover the “why” behind user frustrations and deliver immediate solutions to recurring problems, boosting user satisfaction and building loyalty.

    Stay secure and compliant with analytics that respect user privacy. We follow GDPR, CCPA, and PCI standards to ensure ethical and legal data collection practices.

    Visualize, Analyze, and Optimize with FullSession

    See how to transform user data into actionable insights for peak website performance.

    Use cases

    FullSession is best for:

    • E-commerce businesses to optimize sales funnels and boost conversions
    • SaaS companies to analyze user engagement and increase product adoption rates
    • Marketing teams to optimize campaigns based on real-time user behavior data
    • UX designers to improve interface design and functionality through user insights
    • Data analysts to get in-depth metrics on user interactions and trends
    • Quality assurance teams to identify and resolve website issues promptly
    • Product developers to understand user feedback for new feature implementation
    • Customer support teams to improve response times and issue resolution processes
    • Customer experience professionals to create seamless online user journeys
    • Conversion rate optimization specialists to fine-tune website performance

    Key features 

    FullSession customers
    • Advanced filters and tags: Identify behavior trends and patterns to optimize user journeys and improve engagement and conversion rates.
    • Session recordings and replays: Replay user interactions to diagnose issues, analyze user flows, and understand user behavior without compromising sensitive data.
    • Interactive heatmaps: Analyze click, scroll, and mouse heatmaps to identify areas of high or low user interaction and measure task completion times.
    • Website feedback forms and reports: Collect user feedback through branded forms and connect responses with session recordings for deeper insights.
    • Conversion funnel analysis: Detect patterns that lead to user drop-offs and test new ideas to optimize conversion rates.
    • Error analysis: Quickly detect and address website issues like JavaScript errors and network problems to prevent disruptions in the user experience.

    FullSession vs VWO

    FullSession goes beyond the traditional A/B testing capabilities offered by VWO by capturing, visualizing and analyzing data with its advanced user behavior tools.

    While VWO primarily focuses on optimizing website variations, FullSession provides granular insights into user engagement, making it a better choice for businesses that prioritize understanding user behavior rather than running extensive A/B tests.

    Turn User Behavior into Growth Opportunities

    Learn how to visualize, analyze, and optimize your site with FullSession.

    Integrations

    FullSession integrates with your entire tech stack. It connects with open APIs, modern webhooks, and Zapier and also provides native integrations. It works best with Shopify, WordPress, Wix, and BigCommerce.

    Support

    FullSession is known for responsive customer support. You can reach out by email or chat or visit the knowledge base with articles and tutorials that help you troubleshoot common issues yourself. 

    Pricing

    FullSession pricing

    FullSession offers multiple tools, a free trial and flexible pricing structure with three tiers—Starter, Business, and Enterprise—designed to accommodate businesses of all sizes, from emerging startups to large corporations.

    Our scalable plans allow you to begin with a package that suits your current needs and easily upgrade as your business expands, ensuring you only invest in the required features.

    The entry-level paid plan, priced at an accessible $39/month, includes all essential features with unlimited heatmaps and recording up to 5,000 monthly sessions. It allows you to leverage advanced analytics without a significant financial commitment.

    We offer a 20% discount on all plans for annual subscriptions, providing advanced features and additional value for long-term users.

    Drive Revenue Growth With FullSession

    Learn how to visualize and improve each step in your sales or marketing funnel.

    2. PostHog

    PostHog VWO alternatives

    PostHog is an open-source analytics platform for startups and scaleups. It has core product analytics, experimentation and user behavior tracking features. It’s self-hosted, so you have full control over your data.

    The platform is attractive to tech-savvy companies that prefer having direct access to and ownership of their analytics tools. PostHog is also popular in the tech sector for its flexibility and adaptability.

    Learn more: PostHog alternatives and competitors.

    Use cases

    PostHog helps you measure user engagement, find problem areas and run A/B tests to optimize user experience. Companies use it for feature flagging so they can roll out changes gradually and measure the impact.

    It’s good for teams focused on retaining users, reducing churn and increasing conversion rates. PostHog also helps product managers and developers looking to improve their products.

    Key features

    • Open-source: Gives you full access to modify and use the code.
    • Event tracking: Captures user interactions across your product.
    • Feature flags: Manage feature rollouts efficiently.
    • Heatmaps: Visualize user navigation patterns easily.
    • Session recording: Replay user sessions to understand behavior.
    • Integrations: Works seamlessly with other tools in your stack.
    • Scalability: Handles large volumes of data efficiently.
    • Privacy-focused: Keeps your user data secure and compliant with regulations.

    PostHog vs VWO

    PostHog is free and open-source, unlike VWO, a paid service. It makes it cost-effective for smaller companies or startups. While VWO focuses heavily on A/B testing with broad testing options, PostHog incorporates a wider set of analytics tools, appealing to technical teams.

    PostHog’s ability to host data on your servers offers greater privacy control than VWO’s cloud-based model. This setup benefits companies with strict data privacy requirements or those who want more control over their data.

    Integrations

    PostHog works well with Kafka, Slack, AWS, Google Cloud, GitHub, Tableau, and Looker. These integrations make it easy to plug PostHog into your existing tech stack and get more out of it.

    Support

    PostHog has a community and loads of documentation to support you. While it doesn’t have traditional support channels, it has paid support plans that give you direct access to the developers who can help you solve issues.

    Pricing

    PostHog pricing

    PostHog offers a tiered pricing structure with a free plan for startups and hobbyists, allowing up to 1 million monthly events with essential analytics features.

    After the free plan, you can switch to usage-based plans, starting at $0.00005/event.

    3. Optimizely

    Optimizely VWO competitors

    Optimizely is popular for companies looking for A/B testing and personalization features. It helps you improve your websites and apps through experimentation and integrations with other tools.

    The platform allows you to test different website versions for better conversion rates. Optimizely has a user-friendly interface, so it’s suitable for both technical and nontechnical users.

    Use cases

    Optimizely is used across e-commerce, healthcare and finance. You can use it to improve user engagement on websites and mobile apps. It’s good for testing different design layouts, content variations and marketing messages.

    You can also use it to personalize user experiences based on behavior or demographics. Your visitors can see content that resonates with them, improving conversion rates and customer satisfaction.

    Key features

    • A/B testing: Run experiments to find what works best for your audience.
    • Multivariate testing: Dive deeper into how users interact with different elements on your site.
    • Personalization: Show tailored content to specific audience segments.
    • Feature management: Control which features are released and when.
    • Experimentation platform: Conduct experiments on web, mobile, and full-stack applications.

    Optimizely vs VWO

    Optimizely has more advanced experimentation features than VWO. It’s particularly strong in multivariate testing and personalization. VWO is also a great tool but more geared towards ease of use with slightly fewer features.

    Optimizely might be better for larger companies or those with complex testing needs, and VWO might be better for smaller teams or companies just starting with optimization.

    Integrations

    Optimizely connects with Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, WordPress and Salesforce. It allows you to gather data from multiple sources and use it to inform your experiments.

    Support

    Optimizely has good customer support, including a help center and community forum. You can access documentation and tutorials to get started with the platform.

    They also have 24/7 support via chat or email, so help is always available when needed.

    Pricing

    Optimizely pricing

    Optimizely doesn’t share its pricing details publicly. You need to contact their sales team directly for more information.

    4. Heap

    Heap VWO competitors

    Heap is a digital insights platform that auto-captures data on user interactions, providing comprehensive analytics features so you can see how people use your website or app. You can start analyzing without coding or tagging, which is suitable for fast-paced environments.

    Contentsquare acquired Heap and merged it with its other products, like Hotjar.

    Learn more: Heap alternatives.

    Use cases

    Heap is good for seeing user engagement trends and where users drop off. You can use it for A/B testing, conversion rate optimization and customer journey mapping.

    With its full data collection, Heap works for teams that want to see the complete picture of user behavior without manual tracking.

    Key features

    • Automatic data capture: Collects all user interactions automatically.
    • User segmentation: Helps you segment users based on their behavior.
    • Retroactive analysis: Allows analysis of past user interactions without prior tracking setup.
    • Journey analysis: Maps and analyzes user journeys on your site or app.
    • Event visualizer: Provides visual insights and patterns of user behavior.

    Heap vs VWO

    Heap gives you a complete view of user behavior with its auto-capture, which differs from VWO’s manual approach.

    VWO is suitable for A/B testing and personalization, while Heap is useful for deep behavioral analysis, so it’s a good choice for teams that want to see user engagement patterns.

    Integrations

    Heap connects to CRM systems, marketing platforms and data warehouses. Key integrations include Salesforce, Google Analytics and Slack so that you can have consistent data across all tools.

    Support

    Heap offers documentation, webinars and training sessions. You can get support via email and chat or check out the community forum for more help.

    Pricing

    Heap pricing

    Heap provides a free plan and three pricing tiers. You need to contact sales to get more information.

    5. AB Tasty

    AB Tasty VWO competitors

    AB Tasty is a digital optimization platform that focuses on user experience. It has a user-friendly interface for A/B testing and personalization experiments and also includes a customer data platform you can integrate with third-party applications.

    AB Tasty supports web and mobile platforms and has broad features for user engagement analysis.

    Use cases

    AB Tasty lets you launch and manage A/B tests and personalize user journeys. Marketers use it to improve website performance by testing different layouts, content and features.

    It’s good for e-commerce sites to optimize their checkout process and increase sales. Content creators can use it to tailor messaging and design to different audience segments to improve user engagement.

    Key features

    • A/B testing: Create and test different versions of your website content.
    • Personalization: Customize user experiences based on behavior and preferences.
    • Feature management: Control feature rollouts and optimize the user experience.
    • Widgets: Use pre-built options like banners and modals to engage visitors.
    • Reporting: Access data to track the performance of your tests and campaigns.

    AB Tasty vs VWO

    AB Tasty is easier to use for personalization tasks than VWO. It has more widgets so you can launch and manage experiments and engage users through different creative formats.

    But it doesn’t have all the advanced analytics tools that VWO has. So AB Tasty is good for companies seeking basic but effective experimentation tools. If you want to get projects up and running fast, AB Tasty is a quick and easy solution.

    Integrations

    AB Tasty integrates with Google Analytics, Shopify, Magento, and Salesforce. These integrations make it easier to link test results to business performance data. 

    Support

    AB Tasty has extensive online resources, including a knowledge base and tutorials to get you started. AB Tasty also provides personalized support through customer service representatives and offers consultation services to make the most of the platform’s features.

    Pricing

    AB Tasty pricing

    AB Tasty doesn’t share its pricing information publicly. You need to contact the team for more details.

    6. Amplitude

    Amplitude VWO alternatives

    Amplitude is a product analytics and event-tracking platform to understand user behavior and improve digital products.

    It helps you get insights into customer journeys, segment users and measure the impact of product decisions.

    It’s known for its user-friendly interface and in-depth analytics that integrate easily into your existing tech ecosystem.

    Learn more:

    Use cases

    Amplitude is for businesses that want to analyze user behavior. You can track engagement, measure conversion rates and understand user retention.

    It’s also for product teams that want to optimize their products based on user feedback and behavior data.

    Key features

    • User segmentation: Allows you to segment users based on behavior.
    • Behavioral cohorts: Create groups of users based on their actions.
    • Funnel analysis: Track conversion rates and identify drop-off points.
    • Retention analysis: Measure how often users return to your product.
    • Pathfinder: Visualize user journeys to understand how they interact with your product.

    Amplitude vs VWO

    Amplitude and VWO are different but can work together. Amplitude is for in-depth analytics and user behavior, while VWO is for A/B testing and conversion rate optimization.

    VWO helps you test changes on your site, while Amplitude gives you the data to understand the impact of those changes. Businesses often use both to cover all their optimization needs.

    Integrations

    Amplitude integrates with Slack, Segment and Google Analytics. It gives a single view of your data across all platforms and can make better decisions.

    Support

    You can get help through email, live chat and an extensive online help center. Amplitude also has webinars and training sessions to help you get the most out of the platform.

    Pricing

    Amplitude pricing

    Amplitude provides a free plan and three paid plans, starting at $61/month. The pricing depends on the monthly tracked users and available feature set. You need to contact the sales team for higher plans to get more information.

    7. LaunchDarkly

    LaunchDarkly VWO competitors

    LaunchDarkly is a feature management tool built for developers. It makes software releases easier and helps create better user experiences. It’s a platform where you can roll out features gradually with a kill switch to revert if needed.

    LaunchDarkly gives you control over feature distribution and monitoring and reduces risk when delivering new features. With the sunsetting of Google Optimize, LaunchDarkly offers a strong alternative for feature management and experimentation.

    Use cases

    Software teams get reduced risk during feature deployment, staged rollouts or beta testing. Marketing teams can test features or campaigns without affecting all users.

    It is also helpful for geographic targeting, enabling features in specific regions first. Developers working on large-scale software or apps use it for better experiment management and ease of use during updates.

    Features

    • Feature flags: Enable or disable features for different user groups.
    • Granular targeting: Select who sees specific features based on user attributes.
    • Real-time updates: Adjust settings quickly without redeploying code.
    • Kill switch: Instantly reverse a feature rollout when needed.
    • Detailed analytics: Gain insights into user interaction with new features.
    • Custom workflows: Create custom pathways for feature management teams.

    LaunchDarkly vs VWO

    LaunchDarkly is concentrated on feature management through feature flags, while VWO is focused on A/B testing and personalization. If you need feature control in complex environments, LaunchDarkly might be better for you.

    VWO has more specialized tools for conversion rate optimization and detailed user behavior insights. Both are good but serve different purposes in software development and marketing.

    Integrations

    LaunchDarkly connects with Jira and Slack as well as data platforms, analytics tools and cloud services.

    Support

    LaunchDarkly has email and chat for real-time support. They also include documentation and a community forum where you can ask questions and share tips.

    Pricing

    LaunchDarkly pricing

    LaunchDarkly offers a free plan and three paid plans. The pricing starts at $12 monthly with unlimited seats, projects and environments.

    8. Crazy Egg

    Crazy Egg VWO alternativesCrazy Egg is a website optimization tool that helps you visualize your website data. It shows you how visitors interact with your site through heatmaps, scroll maps and click reports.

    It suits businesses that want to improve user experience and conversion rate. Its simple interface makes it accessible even if you’re not tech-savvy.

    Learn more:

    Use cases

    If you’re a web designer, you can see how users interact with different elements. Marketers can use it to increase conversion rates by seeing which page parts get the most attention.

    Small business owners can use it to increase online sales by improving customer navigation and overall site engagement.

    Features

    • Heatmaps: Visualize where users are clicking and interacting.
    • Scroll maps: See how far down a page users are scrolling.
    • Overlay reports: Get detailed insights on each element on the page.
    • A/B testing: Test variations of pages to see which performs better.
    • Snapshot reports: Capture website activity over specific timeframes.
    • Confetti reports: Break down clicks based on referral sources or campaigns.
    • User recordings: Watch real user sessions to understand their path.

    Crazy Egg vs VWO

    Crazy Egg is known for its simplicity and focuses on heatmaps, click tracking and user session recordings, so it’s good for businesses looking for basic user insights.

    VWO has a full-featured suite of tools that includes advanced A/B testing, multivariate testing and extensive personalization options to run complex experiments and target specific audience segments.

    VWO also supports more integrations with marketing tools and has more customer support resources, whereas Crazy Egg has more straightforward pricing and fewer integrations.

    Integrations

    Crazy Egg integrates with WordPress, Shopify and Google Analytics. It also works with CRM systems and marketing automation platforms like HubSpot.

    Support

    You can access online resources, tutorials and webinars to learn more about using the platform. There’s also email support and one-on-one consultations.

    Pricing

    Crazy Egg pricing

    Crazy Egg offers three pricing plans, starting at $99/month. All plans are billed annually. The cost depends on the tracked pageviews per month. Each plan has unlimited surveys, websites and A/B tests.

    9. FullStory

    FullStory VWO competitors

    FullStory is a digital experience analytics platform that shows you everything your users do on your site. It records browsing sessions so you can see how people interact with your content.

    It gives you insights into user behavior to find areas for improvement. The platform is intuitive, making it easy to analyze user data immediately.

    Use cases

    For eCommerce, it’s good for figuring out why users are abandoning their shopping carts. For SaaS, it helps understand user engagement with the software.

    Also, it helps UX teams to test website navigation. Marketers can see how campaigns drive traffic to specific site parts.

    Key features

    • Session replay: Watch what users do on your site.
    • Heatmaps: Visualize user clicks and taps.
    • Funnel analysis: Track steps users take to achieve a goal.
    • User insights: Get detailed information on user behavior.
    • Custom events: Track specific user actions.

    FullStory vs VWO

    Compared to VWO, FullStory focuses more on qualitative data. While VWO is strong in A/B testing, FullStory stands out in session replay and heat mapping.

    It makes FullStory more helpful in determining complex user behavior. If your priority is experimentation, VWO may be the better choice, but for in-depth analysis of user paths, FullStory is a better solution.

    Integrations

    FullStory integrates with Google Analytics, Slack, Salesforce and Optimizely for experimentation.

    Support

    You can get access to a help center with guides and tutorials.

    Their support team is available by email for more complex questions. They also have live chat for instant help.

    Pricing

    FullStory pricing

    FullStory has four paid plans but doesn’t publicly share its pricing. Due to limited features, you need to pay for mobile analytics as a separate add-on.

    10. Adobe Target

    Adobe Target VWO alternatives

    Adobe Target is part of the Adobe Experience Cloud. It’s for businesses looking to optimize digital experiences. The platform allows you to personalize content across all digital channels so you can better connect with your audience.

    It provides beginner and advanced users with easy setups and detailed testing options. The interface is user-friendly, making it easier to create and analyze tests.

    Use cases

    Adobe Target is good for conversion rate optimization by testing different page layouts. It’s suitable for personalizing content for specific audience segments.

    Another use is delivering personalized product recommendations for e-commerce, improving user experiences. Adobe Target can personalize in-app content for mobile apps based on user behavior.

    Key features

    • A/B testing: Test different page versions to find what works best.
    • Multivariate testing: Test multiple elements together to optimize designs.
    • Automated personalization: Use AI to deliver personalized content in real-time.
    • Mobile app optimization: Improve app experiences with testing and personalization.
    • Geolocation targeting: Tailor content based on users’ locations.
    • Audience segmentation: Group users to deliver targeted experiences.
    • Recommendation engine: Suggest tailored products or content to users.
    • Visual experience composer: Create and test experiences without coding.

    Adobe Target vs VWO

    Adobe Target has deep integration with other Adobe products which can be a big plus if you’re already in the ecosystem. Compared to VWO, Adobe Target is more complex and has more advanced targeting and personalization options.

    VWO is simple, easy to use, and suitable for those new to testing. Adobe Target is robust, with more personalization options but less emphasis on testing.

    Integrations

    Adobe Target integrates with Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Experience Platform and Demandbase.

    Support

    Users can access documentation, tutorials, and community forums for self-help. Adobe provides dedicated customer support, including phone and email assistance. For complex issues, Adobe offers consulting services.

    Pricing

    Adobe Target pricing

    Adobe Target provides custom plans based on your needs. You need to contact their team for more information.

    VWO Alternatives: Comparison Table

    Here’s a quick overview of VWO alternatives to help you decide what you really need for your business.

    ToolKey featuresBest forPricing
    FullSessionUser behavior analytics, session recordings and replays, dynamic heatmaps, conversion funnel analysis and error trackingUX/UI analysis, customer journey mapping, website and conversion rate optimizationStarts at $39/month, includes a free trial
    PostHogA/B testing, feature flags, product analyticsProduct analytics and experimentation; For teams wanting an all-in-one open-source analytics platformFree plan available, paid plans start at $2,000/month
    OptimizelyA/B testing, personalization, full-stack experimentationEnterprise-level experimentation; For large companies needing comprehensive testing across web and mobileCustom pricing
    HeapAuto-capture analytics, retroactive analysisAutomatic event tracking and analysis; For teams wanting to capture all user interactions without manual setupCustom pricing
    AB TastyA/B testing, personalization, AI-powered recommendationsConversion rate optimization; For e-commerce and SaaS companies focusing on personalized user experiencesCustom pricing
    AmplitudeAdvanced analytics, cohort analysis, data analysisIn-depth product analytics; For data-driven teams needing advanced user behavior insightsFree plan available, pricing starts at $61/month
    LaunchDarklyFeature flags, experimentationFeature management and controlled rollouts; For development teams practicing continuous delivery and experimentationFree plan, pricing starts at $12/month
    Crazy EggHeatmaps, scroll maps, A/B testingVisual website optimization; For marketers and designers wanting to understand user interactions visuallyFree trial, pricing starts at $99/month with annual payment
    FullStorySession replay, funnel analysisDigital experience analytics; For teams needing detailed insights into individual user sessions and overall user flowsCustom pricing
    Adobe TargetA/B testing, AI-powered personalizationEnterprise marketing optimization; For large organizations needing advanced personalization and testing capabilities integrated with other Adobe productsCustom pricing

    VWO Competitors: The Best on the List

    FullSession behavioral analysis

    While all the VWO competitors offer valuable features for website optimization and user behavior analysis, FullSession stands out as the best solution.

    One of FullSession’s key strengths is that it can track dynamic elements in real-time, giving precise user insights. This feature lets you understand how users interact with your site’s most complex and changeable parts, giving you a competitive edge in optimizing user experience.

    FullSession accelerates heatmap processing without impacting your site’s speed. It means you get rapid insights into user behavior patterns without sacrificing your website’s performance – a critical factor for user experience and SEO.

    Since data privacy is a top priority, FullSession takes the lead by excluding sensitive data recording. It means you get the insights you need while respecting your users’ privacy, maintaining trust, and complying with data regulations.

    FullSession also excels in handling large data volumes. The platform gives you key insights from massive data sets in seconds so you can make data-driven decisions faster and more confidently.

    Unlike competitors that might track user behavior across multiple sites, FullSession limits tracking to your specific site. It prevents potential data misuse and ensures that the insights you receive are directly relevant to your website’s performance.

    FullSession is also a single platform for cross-team collaboration. Bringing all team efforts onto one platform enables better communication and coordination between different departments, from marketing to development to UX design.

    FullSession offers the tools and insights to drive your online success. Its comprehensive approach to website optimization, coupled with its commitment to user privacy and data management, makes it the standout choice among VWO competitors.

    Visualize, Analyze, and Optimize with FullSession

    See how to transform user data into actionable insights for peak website performance.

    FAQs About VWO Competitors 

    Let’s answer the most common questions about VWO.

    What is VWO?

    VWO (Visual Website Optimizer) is an A/B testing and conversion optimization platform. It helps businesses improve their website by testing different versions of a page to see which one performs better.

    What are VWO limitations?

    High cost and complex features that are overwhelming for small businesses. It’s less flexible than some open-source alternatives like PostHog, which also offers free and self-hosted solutions.

    What’s better than VWO?

    FullSession, Optimizely and UXtweak are often mentioned as better options for different user needs. FullSession is for e-commerce businesses, Optimizely is for big enterprises while UXtweak has comprehensive user research tools.

    Is VWO a long term investment?

    VWO is a good investment if your business needs advanced testing and optimization tools. However, it is not cost-effective for small businesses looking for simple solutions.

    Is VWO a SaaS company?

    Yes, VWO is a SaaS company. They provide web-based access to their testing and optimization tools.

    What is VWO used for?

    A/B testing, multivariate testing, conversion rate optimization. Test different versions of web pages to improve user experience and conversions.



  • 5 PostHog Alternatives and Competitors to Test This Year

    5 PostHog Alternatives and Competitors to Test This Year

    PostHog is a product analytics platform that helps developers and engineering teams enhance product development and user experience. Its key features include web analytics, feature flags, session replays, heatmaps and surveys. However, some users have experienced difficulties with data loading, limited data tracking, technical complexity and a high learning curve, leading them to seek PostHog alternatives.

    One such alternative is FullSession, which offers an all-in-one user behavior analytics software that helps you visualize all user interactions, analyze trends and patterns with laser precision and optimize your website for peak performance.

    In this article, we’ll explore the top PostHog competitors, comparing features, pricing, and use cases to help you find the right tool for your business.

    Key Takeaways

    • FullSession is a user behavior analytics software that helps optimize website usability, interface, experience and performance. It offers session recordings and replays, dynamic heatmaps, website feedback tools, conversion funnel analysis, and error tracking. FullSession prioritizes user privacy and data security and complies with GDPR, CCPA, and PCI standards. It integrates easily with platforms like Shopify, WordPress, Wix, and BigCommerce. Pricing starts at $39 per month, with a 20% discount for annual subscriptions. Book a demo now.
    • Pendo is a product experience and digital adoption platform focusing on user behavior analytics and in-app guidance. It provides product usage insights, in-app guides, feedback collection, and user segmentation, making it useful for product teams and customer success managers. However, it can be expensive for smaller businesses, and the setup can be complex. Pendo integrates with tools like Salesforce, Slack, Jira, and HubSpot. Pricing suits mid-sized companies and enterprises.
    • Mixpanel is a product analytics tool centered around event tracking and behavioral analysis. Its key features include event tracking, cohort analysis, funnel analysis, A/B testing, and retention analysis. While it offers powerful insights, its interface can be overwhelming for non-technical users and advanced features are limited to higher pricing tiers. Mixpanel integrates with Salesforce, Slack, Segment, and Google Analytics. Mixpanel offers a free plan with up to 20 million data points, while more advanced plans start at $24 per month.
    • Kissmetrics is an event analytics tool that tracks user actions to improve conversions and retention. It offers funnel reporting, cohort analysis, behavioral segmentation, and revenue tracking. The platform is somewhat outdated and lacks modern data visualizations, and it can be expensive for startups. Kissmetrics integrates with tools like Google Ads, HubSpot, and Stripe. Pricing starts at $299 monthly, with higher-tier plans offering more features.
    • LogRocket is a product analytics tool focused on increasing conversions and improving product engagement on mobile and desktop apps. Its core features include session replays, error tracking, performance monitoring, heatmaps, and user feedback collection. LogRocket is useful for developers but may not work for teams focused on marketing or UX design. It integrates with Jira, Slack, Trello, and GitHub. Pricing starts at $99 monthly for larger teams, with a free plan available for smaller projects.

    Visualize, Analyze, and Optimize with FullSession

    See how to transform user data into actionable insights for peak website performance.

    5 Top PostHog Competitors Right Now

    If you’re looking for PostHog competitors to fully understand how users interact with your product, here are some of the most popular product analytics tools to consider:

    1. FullSession (Get a demo)
    2. Pendo
    3. Mixpanel
    4. Kissmetrics
    5. LogRocket

    Let’s move on to reviewing each tool and its product analytics features.

    1. FullSession

    FullSession is an all-in-one user behavior analytics platform that captures all customer interactions and provides extensive insights into how people engage with your website.

    Visualize and analyze user behavior data to identify trends and patterns with exceptional accuracy and improve your site’s performance and user experience.

    Get a complete overview of user behavior metrics in one place and track website issues with our easy-to-use dashboard.

    Move beyond basic statistics by observing real-time user interactions. Our session recordings and replays capture every step of the user journey, providing a detailed view of how visitors navigate your site.

    Find problem areas, assess page elements, confirm design changes, and make your site more functional, user-friendly, and efficient with UX heatmap tools.

    Identify and fix barriers to conversions, optimize key parts of the user journey, and reduce abandonment rates in your sales funnels with conversion funnel analysis.

    Use our customer feedback platform to collect direct user input and quickly understand and resolve common issues.

    FullSession offers one of the best website analytics tools while protecting user privacy. We comply with GDPR, CCPA, and PCI standards to increase data security.

    Turn User Behavior into Growth Opportunities

    Learn how to visualize, analyze, and optimize your site with FullSession.

    Use cases

    FullSession is best for a range of professionals and teams, including:

    • E-commerce businesses looking to improve customer journeys and boost sales.
    • SaaS companies that need to analyze user interactions and optimize their platforms.
    • Digital marketers aiming to reduce drop-offs in conversion funnels.
    • UX designers who want to track how users engage with different page elements.
    • Data analysts working on identifying behavior patterns to improve engagement.
    • Product development teams wanting to validate design changes.
    • Customer support teams aiming to resolve user frustrations.
    • Quality assurance teams for testing the user interface.

    Key features

    • Advanced filters: Create custom dashboards, spot trends, patterns, and correlations in customer behavior to optimize user journeys, boost engagement, and improve conversion rates.
    • Session recordings and replays: Record every user interaction on your website to troubleshoot issues and understand user behavior. Use session replay, filter recordings by specific criteria, and predict future actions based on past data. FullSession ensures privacy by excluding sensitive information from recordings.
    • Interactive heatmaps: Switch between mouse movement, click maps, and scroll maps to find areas with high or low user activity. Test page elements to discover top performers and measure task completion times. Get instant heatmap data with zero delays and no impact on website performance.
    • Website feedback forms and reports: Create branded forms to collect insights on user satisfaction, pain points, and feature requests. Link feedback to session recordings for deeper context and to understand what led to the comment.
    • Conversion funnel optimization: Discover why users drop off at specific stages. Visualize user behavior at each step, identify weak points, and test different designs or content to boost conversions.
    • Error analysis: Automatically detect JavaScript errors, network failures, or API problems. Use error data to troubleshoot, find root causes, and prevent these problems from affecting user experience.

    How FullSession compares to PostHog

    FullSession is primarily a user behavior analytics tool to visualize user engagement and analyze interaction patterns, while PostHog offers a broader range of product analytics features.  

    FullSession suits professionals and teams looking to improve user experience and website performance, while PostHog targets product and development teams looking for feature experimentation capabilities.

    FullSession has an intuitive dashboard and is easy to implement. PostHog may have a steeper learning curve due to its more complex feature set.

    FullSession also provides a flat monthly fee for all its pricing plans, with a 20% discount on annual plans. PostHog offers pricing per tracked event, recording, request and similar.

    Limitations

    FullSession doesn’t support collecting user behavior data in native mobile apps.

    Integrations

    FullSession connects with popular platforms like Shopify, WordPress, Wix, and BigCommerce. It also integrates with other apps through Zapier and Open APIs, making it easy to connect with your existing tech stack and automate workflows.

    Customer support

    FullSession provides excellent customer support via live chat and email. The support team is highly responsive, and they offer a detailed help center for users who prefer to troubleshoot issues on their own.

    Pricing

    FullSession offers a free trial and three paid plans – Starter, Business, and Enterprise.

    Our flexible pricing lets you choose a plan that matches your current needs, with the option to upgrade as your business grows. This way, you only pay for the features you truly need.

    The Free plan is available at $0/month and lets you track up to 500 sessions per month with 30 days of data retention, making it ideal for testing core features like session replay, heatmaps, and frustration signals. It’s an free way to access advanced analytics without stretching your budget.

    Opt for an annual subscription to save 20% on all plans if you want to:

    1. Track dynamic elements in real time for precise user insights
    2. Accelerate heatmap processing with zero impact on site speed
    3. Protect user privacy by excluding sensitive data recording
    4. Manage extensive data sets effectively and quickly reveal key insights
    5. Limit user behavior tracking to your site, preventing data misuse 
    6. Facilitate cross-team collaboration and unify team efforts on one platform

    Drive Revenue Growth With FullSession

    Learn how to visualize and improve each step in your sales or marketing funnel.

    2. Pendo

    Pendo is a product experience and digital adoption platform that helps businesses understand user behavior, onboard new customers, and provide in-app guidance.

    Learn more: Pendo competitors and alternatives.

    User rating

    Image source: G2

    Pendo has an average user rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars based on over 1,445 reviews on G2.

    Use cases

    Pendo is used by product teams, marketing departments, and customer success teams to:

    • Onboard new users with in-app guides and tooltips.
    • Track user behavior to improve product design and features.
    • Collect feedback directly from users with surveys.
    • Monitor product usage to identify areas for improvement.
    • Engage users with timely in-app messages and notifications.

    Key features

    • Product usage analytics: Get detailed insights into how users interact with your product, which features they use most, and where they drop off.
    • In-app guides: Create onboarding flows, product walkthroughs, and tooltips to help users understand your product better.
    • Feedback collection: Gather user feedback directly within your app through customizable user surveys.
    • Segmentation: Segment users based on behavior to provide personalized experiences.
    • Mobile app analytics: Track user interactions on both web and mobile apps.

    How Pendo compares to PostHog

    While Pendo and PostHog provide practical analytics tools, Pendo excels in its in-app guidance features. PostHog concentrates on event tracking and technical insights, whereas Pendo focuses on improving user engagement and providing direct user support.

    Pendo’s combination of product usage insights and user guidance tools makes it a good choice for product managers looking to boost onboarding and user satisfaction.

    Limitations

    One of the main drawbacks of Pendo is its pricing, which can be expensive for small businesses or startups. It also doesn’t have feature flags, which is one of the key features of PostHog. Additionally, it can be complex to set up and customize, especially for teams without technical expertise.

    Integrations

    Pendo offers native integrations with Salesforce, Slack, Jira, and HubSpot. It also supports open APIs, enabling you to connect Pendo with your existing tech stack for a smooth data flow between platforms.

    Customer support

    Pendo offers live chat, email, and an extensive help center with resources like webinars and documentation. Their customer success team is also available for more personalized guidance.

    Pricing

    Pendo’s pricing is designed for mid-sized and enterprise businesses. Although exact costs aren’t listed publicly, it’s considered a premium tool, with starting packages priced higher than some competitors.

    3. Mixpanel

    Mixpanel is a product analytics platform that allows businesses to track and analyze how users engage with their websites or mobile apps. It focuses on event tracking and user behavior, making it useful for teams that want to understand their users’ actions across different touchpoints.

    Learn more: 

    User rating

    Image source: G2

    Mixpanel has an average user rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars, based on 1,126 reviews on G2.

    Use cases

    Mixpanel is often used by product managers, data analysts, and marketers for:

    • Tracking user interactions across websites and mobile apps.
    • Analyzing customer journeys to find drop-off points and areas of improvement.
    • Monitoring feature adoption to determine which product features are most used.
    • Segmenting users based on their behavior to deliver personalized experiences.

    Key features

    • Event tracking: Track specific actions users take, like clicks, form submissions, and purchases, across your app or website.
    • Cohort analysis: Group users based on their behavior and analyze how different cohorts behave over time.
    • Funnel analysis: Identify where users drop off in key flows, such as onboarding or checkout processes.
    • A/B testing: Experiment with different versions of your app or website to determine which performs better with users.
    • Retention analysis: Understand how well your product retains users and what actions contribute to long-term engagement.

    How Mixpanel compares to PostHog

    Mixpanel focuses heavily on event-based tracking and analysis, making it suitable for teams that need in-depth insight into specific user actions.

    PostHog offers similar event tracking but includes session replays and self-hosting options, which may appeal to teams with stricter data privacy needs.

    Mixpanel’s emphasis on A/B testing and cohort analysis can provide value for businesses that prioritize continuous improvement based on user behavior.

    Limitations

    Mixpanel’s interface can be overwhelming for non-technical users, especially those unfamiliar with event-based tracking systems. Additionally, while Mixpanel offers a free plan, its more advanced features are locked behind higher-tier pricing, which can be expensive for smaller businesses.

    Integrations

    Mixpanel integrates with Figma, Slack, Segment, and HubSpot. It also supports open API, allowing for custom integrations with other tools in your tech stack.

    Customer support

    Mixpanel provides customer support through live chat, email, and extensive documentation.

    Pricing

    Mixpanel offers a free plan for up to 20M data points per month, but more advanced features, such as data pipelines and A/B testing, require a paid plan. Pricing starts at $24 per month for the Growth plan, with additional costs for enterprise-level features.

    4. Kissmetrics

    Kissmetrics is a person-based event analytics platform designed to track user behavior and provide insights into how customers interact with your website or app.

    Unlike traditional web analytics tools, Kissmetrics focuses on individual user actions, helping you understand customer journeys and improve retention, engagement, and conversion rates.

    User rating

    Image source: G2

    Kissmetrics holds an average user rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, according to 168 G2 reviews.

    Use cases

    Kissmetrics is primarily used by marketing teams, product managers, and growth teams to:

    • Track individual user behavior across multiple sessions and devices.
    • Measure customer engagement with key product features.
    • Analyze customer journeys to identify where users drop off or lose interest.
    • Optimize marketing funnels for better conversions by analyzing campaign performance.
    • Track cohort retention to see how user engagement changes over time.

    Key features

    • User behavior tracking: Track user activity on your site or app to understand how visitors interact with your product.
    • Funnel reports: Analyze where users drop off in your funnels and optimize these stages to improve conversion rates.
    • Cohort analysis: View how groups of users behave over time and identify patterns in user retention and engagement.
    • Revenue reporting: Tie user behavior to revenue metrics, helping you understand which actions lead to purchases or other desired outcomes.
    • Email campaign tracking: Track the effectiveness of your email campaigns and how they contribute to user behavior.

    How Kissmetrics compares to PostHog

    Kissmetrics focuses more on marketing funnels and user retention, making it a better fit for teams that need product and marketing insights. 

    PostHog offers a more technical focus, including event tracking, session replays, and self-hosting options.

    Kissmetrics doesn’t offer session replays, so if you’re looking for visual representations of user behavior, FullSession might be a better PostHog alternative.

    Limitations

    Kissmetrics is often seen as less flexible and modern than newer analytics tools. Some users report that it can be harder to use and lacks competitors’ advanced visualizations.

    Its pricing model can also challenge smaller businesses, as many advanced features are only available on higher-tier plans.

    Integrations

    Kissmetrics integrates with popular marketing and sales platforms like Google Ads, HubSpot, Optimizely, and Stripe. It also supports custom integrations through its API, enabling you to sync Kissmetrics with other tools in your stack.

    Customer support

    Kissmetrics offers customer support through email and chat, with a dedicated help center for users who want to troubleshoot issues on their own.

    Pricing

    Kissmetrics offers several pricing plans depending on the size and needs of your business. Pricing starts at $299 per month, making it one of the more expensive options for businesses just starting out.

    For larger companies looking to track extensive data and integrate with multiple tools, enterprise pricing is available, though it requires direct consultation with Kissmetrics to get a custom quote.

    5. LogRocket

    LogRocket is a product analytics tool that focuses on session replays, error tracking, and performance monitoring. It allows teams to capture and replay user sessions, providing detailed insights into how users interact with websites and applications.

    Learn more:

    User rating

    Image source: G2

    LogRocket has an average user rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars based on 1,610 reviews on G2.

    Use cases

    LogRocket is commonly used by:

    • Development teams to debug and fix issues faster by reviewing session replays and logs.
    • Product managers to understand how users interact with specific features.
    • QA teams to reproduce bugs reported by users and ensure a smoother product experience.
    • Customer support teams to help troubleshoot user-reported problems by viewing what the user experienced.

    Key features

    • Session replays: Record and replay user sessions to see exactly how users interact with your site or app, helping you understand and resolve user issues.
    • Error tracking: Automatically capture JavaScript errors, network requests, and console logs, so you can identify and fix problems that may impact the user experience.
    • Performance monitoring: Track page load times, slow resources, and other performance metrics to optimize your site’s speed and responsiveness.
    • Heatmaps: Visualize where users click, scroll, and hover to better understand user behavior with website heatmap tools.
    • User feedback: Collect direct feedback from users and link it with session replays to get a complete picture of their experience.
    • Crash reporting: Get detailed crash reports to identify technical issues causing apps or pages to fail.

    How LogRocket compares to PostHog

    LogRocket focuses on session replays, error tracking, and performance monitoring. It makes it more developer-friendly than PostHog, which concentrates on event tracking and data analytics.

    If you want to understand user behavior in sessions and diagnose technical problems, LogRocket may provide more value than PostHog. 

    On the other hand, PostHog offers more advanced behavioral analytics features and customizable data tracking, which may better suit product and marketing teams.

    Limitations

    LogRocket targets developers and troubleshooting. While it does offer analytics features, teams looking for detailed behavioral data or event tracking may find FullSession or PostHog more suitable.

    Additionally, LogRocket may not be as beneficial for teams solely focused on user experience design or marketing analytics.

    Integrations

    LogRocket integrates with tools like Jira, Salesforce, Trello, and GitHub, allowing you to connect your error reports and session replays with your existing development and project management workflows. It also integrates with digital analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Segment for more comprehensive data reporting.

    Customer support

    LogRocket provides customer support via live chat, email, and an extensive knowledge base with articles, guides, and tutorials.

    Pricing

    LogRocket offers a free plan for small-scale projects. Its paid plans start at $99 per month for larger teams. The paid plans include additional session recordings and advanced features, such as performance monitoring and detailed error tracking.

    Enterprise pricing is also available for companies that need custom solutions and support.

    PostHog Alternatives: Comparison Table

    If you’re looking for alternatives to PostHog, it’s important to compare features that matter most for your business. Below is a quick overview of the top PostHog alternatives, highlighting key capabilities of each platform.

    FullSessionPendoMixpanelKissmetricsLogRocket
    Conversion funnel analysis
    Error tracking
    Session replays
    Heatmaps
    Feedback collection
    User segmentation
    Monthly pricing$39n/a$24$299$99

    PostHog Alternatives: The Best Solution On the List

    FullSession is the best alternative to PostHog for businesses that want in-depth user insights without compromising performance or privacy.

    FullSession’s real-time tracking of dynamic elements provides precise and accurate data, enabling faster decision-making and immediate website optimization—an area where it exceeds PostHog.

    Unlike PostHog, FullSession offers fast heatmap processing without affecting site speed. It ensures seamless access to user interaction data while maintaining website performance, vital for user engagement and SEO.

    FullSession prioritizes privacy by allowing you to exclude sensitive data from recordings. It ensures compliance with regulations like GDPR and builds user trust, giving it a clear advantage in privacy-conscious markets.

    FullSession is designed to handle large datasets so you can find important insights faster than PostHog’s broader analytics approach.

    FullSession restricts tracking to your website alone, preventing data misuse and offering a controlled, secure approach to analytics—perfect for businesses cautious about wider tracking methods.

    FullSession brings teams together on one platform. It simplifies workflows, improves communication, and provides a more cohesive user experience than PostHog’s multi-tool approach.

    Ready to see the difference? Schedule a demo today and discover how FullSession can transform your user behavior insights.

    Visualize, Analyze, and Optimize with FullSession

    See how to transform user data into actionable insights for peak website performance.



  • Looking for the Best Mouseflow Alternative? Check this out!

    Looking for the Best Mouseflow Alternative? Check this out!

    Are you tired of using Mouseflow for your website analytics? Do you need more advanced features or a fresh approach to understanding your users? 

    Don’t worry, you’re not alone! 

    In this article, we will help you find the best Mouseflow alternative that can help you dig deeper into user behavior, satisfaction, and retention. You’ll discover new ways to improve your website performance and keep visitors happy.

    Which Mouseflow Alternative Should You Pick?

    We’ve got a great list of choices for the Mouseflow alternative that might be just what you need. Let’s share the top options:

    1. FullSession: User behavior analytics software that offers session recordings and replays, dynamic heatmaps, website feedback forms, conversion funnel analysis and error tracking. Pricing starts at $39/month with a 20% discount on annual plans. Book a demo to learn more.
    2. ProProfs Qualaroo: Customer feedback collection and survey tool that provides targeted surveys, sentiment analysis, and A/B testing to gather user opinions and insights about your product. Pricing for this qualitative analytics solution starts at $39.99/month.
    3. LogRocket: Error tracking and session replay platform featuring JavaScript error tracking, performance monitoring, and session replay with console logs. Paid plans start at $69/month.
    4. Lucky Orange: Website optimization tool offering session recordings, dynamic heatmaps, form analytics, and conversion funnels to improve conversion rates. Pricing starts at $39/month.
    5. Pendo: Product experience and digital adoption software with in-app guides, feature usage tracking, and user feedback collection to improve product adoption. Pricing info is unavailable.

    Take some time to check out each option and see which one feels right for you!

    1. FullSession

    FullSession Mouseflow alternative

    Capture all user interactions, visualize trends and patterns, analyze user behavior, and optimize your site’s interface, usability, experience and performance with FullSession, our user behavior analytics software. 

    View all user behavior data in one clear, simple dashboard.

    Look beyond basic stats – watch live session recordings and see precisely how people engage with your site from start to finish.

    Find underperforming areas, try out different designs, confirm what works, and make your site easier and faster to use with UX heatmap tools.

    Spot and fix issues that stop sales, improve key user journey stages and keep more visitors moving through your funnel with conversion funnel analysis.

    Hear directly from users about their problems, understand why they get frustrated, and quickly solve common issues with customer feedback collection tools.

    Choose FullSession for safe, private analytics. We protect your users’ privacy through GDPR, CCPA, and PCI compliance.

    Start a free trial or get a demo to learn more.

    Key features

    FullSession customers
    1. Smart filters: Find trends, patterns and correlations in user behavior to improve user journeys and boost conversions.
    2. Session playback: Observe all interactions, spot issues, and predict future behavior while protecting users’ privacy.
    3. Dynamic heatmaps: See where users click, move, and scroll to find hot and cold spots on your site. Get heatmap data with zero impact on site speed.
    4. User feedback: Collect insights with branded website feedback forms and link them to session recordings for additional context.
    5. Conversion funnel analysis: Identify drop-off points and experiment with design, content or layout to improve conversion rates.
    6. Error tracking: Automatically detect and fix website issues by finding JavaScript errors, network problems and failed API calls to keep the user experience smooth.

    FullSession also integrates with Shopify, WordPress, Wix, and BigCommerce. It connects with open APIs, modern webhooks, and Zapier and also provides native integrations.

    Pros

    • Track dynamic elements in real time for precise user insights
    • Accelerate heatmap processing with zero impact on site speed
    • Protect user privacy by excluding sensitive data recording
    • Manage extensive data sets effectively and quickly reveal key insights
    • Limit user behavior tracking to your site, preventing data misuse 
    • Facilitate cross-team collaboration and unify team efforts on one platform

    Cons

    • Doesn’t work for mobile apps (just websites)

    Pricing

    FullSession pricing

    FullSession has three pricing plans to choose from:

    1. Starter: Perfect for small businesses
    2. Business: Great for growing companies
    3. Enterprise: For big businesses with lots of visitors

    The Starter plan costs $39 per month. It lets you track up to 5,000 visitors monthly and includes all the main features. 

    Want to save some money? With annual payment, you get 20% off

    Not sure which plan is right for you? No worries! You can start small and upgrade later if you need to. FullSession grows with your business, so you only pay for what you need.

    Ready to give it a try? 

    You can start a free trial or get a demo to learn more.

    2. ProProfs Qualaroo

    Qualaroo Mouseflow alternative

    ProProfs Qualaroo is a user feedback and survey tool that helps you gather actionable insights from your website visitors and customers.

    It offers broad features for creating and deploying targeted surveys, analyzing responses, and improving user experience.

    Whether you’re figuring out why customers abandon their carts or how they feel about your site navigation, ProProfs Qualaroo offers the user feedback tools to ask the right questions at the right time.

    Key features

    1. Targeted surveys: Create and deploy surveys based on user behavior and demographics.
    2. AI-powered insights: Automatically analyze open-ended responses using natural language processing.
    3. Skip logic: Customize survey flow based on user responses.
    4. Multiple question types: Choose from various question formats to suit your needs.
    5. Integration capabilities: Connect with popular analytics and CRM tools.

    Pros

    • Easy to set up and use
    • Flexible targeting options
    • Real-time reporting and analytics
    • Mobile-friendly surveys
    • A/B testing capabilities

    Cons

    • Limited customization options for survey design
    • Higher pricing compared to some competitors
    • Some advanced features are only available in higher-tier plans

    Pricing

    ProProfs Qualaroo pricing

    ProProfs Qualaroo provides a free plan with up to 50 responses and a Business plan starting at $79.99 monthly. You can also include a White Label Package for $30 per month.

    3. LogRocket

    LogRocket Mouseflow alternative

    LogRocket is a comprehensive product analytics and session replay platform that helps software teams improve user experience and troubleshoot issues.

    It combines session replay, product analytics, and error tracking to provide a holistic view of user interactions and application performance.

    Learn more:

    Key features

    1. Session replay: Capture and replay user sessions to visualize interactions and diagnose issues.
    2. Product analytics: Track user behavior and engagement across web and mobile apps.
    3. Error tracking: Automatically detect and report JavaScript errors and API failures.
    4. Performance monitoring: Measure and optimize application speed and responsiveness.
    5. User frustration detection: Identify pain points in user experience using AI-powered analysis.

    Pros

    • Comprehensive suite of tools in one platform
    • Detailed session replay with console logs and network requests
    • Advanced filtering and search capabilities
    • Integrations with popular development and analytics tools
    • Privacy-focused with data masking options

    Cons

    • Steeper learning curve due to extensive features
    • It can be resource-intensive on client-side
    • Pricing may be high for smaller teams or projects

    Pricing

    LogRocket pricing

    LogRocket provides a free plan to record up to 1,000 sessions/month with three available seats and one month of data retention.

    Paid plans start at $99/month for tracking 10,000 sessions/month with up to 10 seats and one-month data retention.

    4. Lucky Orange

    Lucky Orange Mouseflow alternative

    Lucky Orange is a comprehensive website optimization tool that helps you understand user behavior. It provides real-time insights into visitor interactions, helping you boost conversions and improve user experience.

    It includes features like real-time analytics, heatmaps, and session replay, and it even has interactive polls and a live chat option.

    It lets you chat with users directly as they browse, which can help you provide support and collect feedback on the fly.

    Learn more:

    Key features

    1. Dynamic heatmaps: Visualize user clicks, movements, and scrolls on your website.
    2. Session recordings: Replay visitor sessions to understand user behavior and pain points.
    3. Live chat: Engage with visitors in real-time to provide support and collect feedback.
    4. Form analytics: Track form submissions and identify where users abandon forms.
    5. Conversion funnels: Analyze user journeys and identify drop-off points in your conversion process.

    Pros

    • User-friendly interface with an intuitive dashboard
    • Real-time data updates for immediate insights
    • Extensive suite of tools in one platform
    • Affordable pricing options 
    • Integration with popular platforms like HubSpot

    Cons

    • Limited customization options for some features
    • Can be resource-intensive on websites with high traffic
    • Some advanced features only available in higher-tier plans

    Pricing

    Lucky Orange pricing

    Lucky Orange provides a free plan with up to 100 monthly sessions and four paid plans, starting at $39/month for recording up to 5,000 sessions with 60 days of data storage.

    5. Pendo

    Pendo Mouseflow alternative

    Pendo is a product experience platform that helps software teams understand and guide their users.

    It combines product analytics, user feedback, and in-app guidance to improve user onboarding, feature adoption, and overall product experience.

    Pendo is helpful for SaaS companies and enterprise software providers.

    Learn more: Pendo competitors and alternatives.

    Key features

    1. Product analytics: Track user behavior, feature usage, and engagement metrics.
    2. In-app guides: Create and deploy targeted in-app messages, tooltips, and walkthroughs.
    3. Feedback collection: Gather user insights through in-app surveys and polls.
    4. User segmentation: Create custom segments based on user behavior and attributes.
    5. Roadmapping: Prioritize product development based on user data and feedback.

    Pros

    • A comprehensive suite of product experience tools
    • Advanced analytics with custom event tracking
    • No-code guide builder for easy in-app messaging
    • Integrations with popular tools and platforms
    • Strong data visualization capabilities

    Cons

    • Steeper learning curve due to extensive features
    • It can be resource-intensive for smaller applications
    • Higher pricing compared to some competitors
    • Some users report occasional performance issues

    Pricing

    Pendo pricing

    Pendo’s pricing is custom-based, and specific rates are not publicly disclosed. Prospective customers are encouraged to contact Pendo for a personalized quote.

    Mouseflow Alternatives: How They Stack Up

    Let’s look at how some popular Mouseflow alternatives compare.

    ToolKey FeaturesBest ForPricing
    FullSessionUser behavior analytics, session recordings and replays, dynamic heatmaps, conversion funnel analysis and error trackingUX/UI analysis, customer journey mapping, website and conversion rate optimizationStarts at $39/month, includes a free trial
    ProProfs QualarooOn-site surveys, user feedbackCompanies focused on user researchStarts at $80/month
    LogRocketSession replays, error tracking, performance monitoringDevelopers and tech teamsStarts at $99/month
    Lucky OrangeHeatmaps, form analytics, chatE-commerce sitesStarts at $39/month
    PendoIn-app guides, product analytics, user feedbackProduct teams in larger companiesCustom pricing

    Each alternative to Mouseflow has its strengths, so think about what matters most for your business. Do you need detailed user behavior data? Are you more interested in gathering feedback? Your choice will depend on your specific needs and budget.

    What is the Best Mouseflow Alternative? Our Verdict

    Mouseflow alternative

    Among the many Mouseflow alternatives for website optimization and user behavior analysis, FullSession is the top choice because of its advanced features and functionality.

    FullSession’s real-time tracking of dynamic elements gives you exceptional insights into user interactions with complex, changeable website components.

    The platform’s fast heatmap processing doesn’t slow down your website, which is important for user experience and SEO.

    FullSession prioritizes user privacy and security by excluding sensitive data from recordings so you comply with data regulations, building customer trust.

    The software gives you key insights from large datasets in seconds so you can make fast and confident data-driven decisions.

    Unlike some competitors, FullSession limits tracking to your site, so you prevent data misuse and get super relevant insights.

    As a single platform for cross-team collaboration, FullSession helps improve communication and coordination across marketing, development and UX design teams.

    Ready for advanced website optimization?

    Start a free trial or book a demo now.

    FAQs About Mouseflow Alternatives

    Let’s answer the most common questions about Mouseflow.

    What is Mouseflow?

    Mouseflow is a website analytics and user behavior tracking tool that offers features like session replay, heatmaps, funnels, and form analytics to help businesses understand and optimize their users’ experiences.

    Learn more:

    What are Mouseflow’s features?

    Mouseflow’s key features include session recordings, heatmaps (click, move, and scroll), conversion funnels, form analytics, user feedback tools, and website analytics.

    What is better than Mouseflow?

    While “better” is subjective, FullSession offers advantages over Mouseflow, such as real-time tracking of dynamic elements, faster heatmap processing, superior data privacy measures, and efficient handling of large data volumes. Google Analytics is another free alternative to Mouseflow for website owners looking for raw data.

    Why do you need a Mouseflow alternative?

    You might consider a Mouseflow alternative if you need more advanced features, better performance, improved privacy controls, enhanced data handling capabilities, or a more cost-effective solution for your specific use case.

    Is Mouseflow legal?

    Yes, Mouseflow is legal when used in compliance with data protection regulations like GDPR and CCPA. However, it’s crucial to implement it correctly and inform users about data collection practices.

    Why use Mouseflow?

    Mouseflow can help businesses understand user behavior, identify user interface issues, optimize conversion rates, and improve website performance through its analytics and visualization tools.

    How do I set up Mouseflow?

    To set up Mouseflow:

    1. Create a Mouseflow account
    2. Add your website
    3. Install the Mouseflow tracking code on your site (either manually or via a plugin)
    4. Configure your settings and preferences
    5. Start collecting and analyzing data

    Review and adjust your privacy settings and ensure compliance with relevant data protection laws.



    Get Fullsession